Website review, no card needed

pgncom.co.id logo

pgncom.co.id website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202646 issues · 90 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on pgncom.co.id, 15 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 312.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
117 ms83 msMay 16Oct 3193 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 202699 ms
Jun 13, 2026101 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026102 ms
Jul 18, 202697 ms
Jul 25, 202692 ms
Aug 1, 202688 ms
Aug 8, 202691 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202689 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 202692 ms
Sep 19, 202699 ms
Sep 26, 2026101 ms
Oct 3, 2026101 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms
Oct 17, 202693 ms
Oct 24, 202692 ms
Oct 31, 202693 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pgncom.co.id (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pgncom.co.id at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. pgncom.co.id at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. pgncom.co.id at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. pgncom.co.id at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. pgncom.co.id at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. pgncom.co.id at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. pgncom.co.id at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. pgncom.co.id at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

6 to fix64
  • Improve image delivery

    33.4 s · 8.7 MB

    8 images could be 8.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 33.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 217 KiB

    About 217 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 222 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (222 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 83 KiB

    About 83 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare CDN and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 306 KiB and 272 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 107 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 511 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 51.1 s

    51.1 s

    Your largest element takes 51.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 51.9 s

    51.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 51.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 93 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 132 ms

    132 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 132 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 11.0 MB in 66 requests

    11.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.0 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 10.0 MB (32), scripts 491 KiB (12) and fonts 323 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    1.1 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1759845511_68e51c87adfe1.png at 1,414 px wide, shown at 286 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (2.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (2.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.11 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.11 g of CO₂e: 372.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7786
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 7 images without alt text

    7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings should not be empty (3 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7577
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (1 characters)

    Your meta description is only 1 characters: “.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://pgncom.co.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 26 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 26 pages on pgncom.co.id and 10 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Updates”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “PGNCOM | Telecommunication Provider and ICT Solution company”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://pgncom.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (388 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 10 pages share 2 titles

    /, https://pgncom.co.id/lang/id and https://pgncom.co.id/products all use the title “PGNCOM | Telecommunication Provider and ICT Solution company”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://pgncom.co.id/news, https://pgncom.co.id/innovations, https://pgncom.co.id/news-detail/105/pgncom-gelar-safari-ramadhan-pgncom-2026-perkuat-kebersamaan-dan-kepedulian-sosial, https://pgncom.co.id/news-detail/104/pgncom-raih-dua-penghargaan-pada-bulan-k3-subholding-gas-tahun-2026 and https://pgncom.co.id/news-detail/103/pgncom-mendapat-apresiasi-pada-rapat-koordinasi-corporate-secretary-sh-gas-2026 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    https://pgncom.co.id/lang/id, https://pgncom.co.id/contact, https://pgncom.co.id/about-us, https://pgncom.co.id/bod, https://pgncom.co.id/products and https://pgncom.co.id/companyvalue and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://pgncom.co.id/contact, https://pgncom.co.id/about-us, https://pgncom.co.id/products, https://pgncom.co.id/companyvalue, https://pgncom.co.id/award and https://pgncom.co.id/news and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://pgncom.co.id/lead has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The Content Security Policy directive 'upgrade-insecure-requests' is ignored when delivered in a report-only policy.”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 263 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 263 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT US”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Click to join!” and “click here and we'll contact you”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pgncom.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Telemedia Dinamika Sarana, PT

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on pgncom.co.id, including 15 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25