Website review, no card needed
pinkmintlove.pl website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202635 issues · 79 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on pinkmintlove.pl, 14 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #77,832 of 104,602 reviewed websitesbeats 22%
- #48,070 of 58,595 online storesbeats 15%
- #45,012 of 53,362 Shopify storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 218 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 302 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
0.9 s
1.4 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.8 s
3.2 s
3.7 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 370 KiBAbout 370 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
3,764 HTML elements
The page has 3,764 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 1.1 MB8 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 137 KiB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (137 KiB).
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 698 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, kiwisizing.com and Klaviyo and others), adding 568 KiB and 273 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 30 KiBAbout 30 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.1 s
16.1 sYour largest element takes 16.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “STYLEWALKER – NOWOCZESNE MĘSKIE BUTY NA CO DZIEŃ”.
Time to Interactive: 16.3 s
16.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.338
0.338The layout shifts by 0.338 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 42% slower for real visitors
+42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 218 ms to 302 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 4.7 s
4.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 173 ms
173 msReal visitors wait 173 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 759 ms
759 msReal visitors wait 759 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 5 ms
5 msScripts block the page for only 5 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
Max_gif_product_1_optimized_170x.gif weighs 658 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 231 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 231 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (14), other files 977 KiB (101) and scripts 745 KiB (76). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (973 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.91 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.91 g of CO₂e: 109.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
78 text elements with low contrast
78 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (26 characters)
Your title is only 26 characters: “Original – PinkMintLove PL”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
89 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 89 pages on pinkmintlove.pl and 3 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://pinkmintlove.pl/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pinkmintlove.pl/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,075 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://pinkmintlove.pl/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
12 pages without a meta description
https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-zimowe, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-damskie, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-meskie, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-letnie, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/odziez-zimowa and https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/odziez-damska and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/sale has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 pages with very little text
https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/buty, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-zimowe, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-damskie, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-meskie, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-letnie and https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/ubrania-letnie and 2 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/buty, https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-damskie and https://pinkmintlove.pl/collections/obuwie-meskie took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 63 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 57 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'querySelector')”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 778 words of copy
The homepage carries about 778 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pinkmintlove.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pumper Bundles · Sami Product Labels · Tipo Related Products · Shinetrust Product Badges · Judge Me Reviews · Globo Also Bought Cross Sell · Willdesk Live Chat Helpdesk · kiwisizing.com · netlify.app · pandect.es · klaviyo.com · recapture.io · faq-king.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on pinkmintlove.pl, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.