Website review, no card needed

pir.org logo

pir.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202633 issues · 84 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on pir.org, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.7 s3.8 sMay 2Oct 174.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20266.3 s
May 9, 20266.3 s
May 16, 20266.3 s
May 23, 20266.4 s
May 30, 20266.3 s
Jun 6, 20266.0 s
Jun 13, 20265.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.3 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.7 s
Jul 25, 20264.8 s
Aug 1, 20264.9 s
Aug 8, 20264.7 s
Aug 15, 20264.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.9 s
Aug 29, 20265.3 s
Sep 5, 20265.3 s
Sep 12, 20265.7 s
Sep 19, 20265.9 s
Sep 26, 20265.7 s
Oct 3, 20265.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.8 s
Oct 17, 20264.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
383 ms125 msMay 2Oct 17235 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026353 ms
May 9, 2026351 ms
May 16, 2026352 ms
May 23, 2026337 ms
May 30, 2026306 ms
Jun 6, 2026279 ms
Jun 13, 2026202 ms
Jun 20, 2026181 ms
Jun 27, 2026155 ms
Jul 4, 2026168 ms
Jul 11, 2026177 ms
Jul 18, 2026177 ms
Jul 25, 2026175 ms
Aug 1, 2026173 ms
Aug 8, 2026172 ms
Aug 15, 2026175 ms
Aug 22, 2026177 ms
Aug 29, 2026197 ms
Sep 5, 2026195 ms
Sep 12, 2026254 ms
Sep 19, 2026271 ms
Sep 26, 2026288 ms
Oct 3, 2026293 ms
Oct 10, 2026246 ms
Oct 17, 2026235 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pir.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pir.org at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. pir.org at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. pir.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. pir.org at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. pir.org at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. pir.org at 2.9 s2.9 s
  7. pir.org at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. pir.org at 3.9 s3.9 s

Speed

9 to fix43
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.5 s

    32 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 329 KiB

    About 329 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 61). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.9 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 907 KiB

    About 907 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 642 ms

    642 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 642 ms of main-thread work and 992 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 389 ms

    389 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 389 ms of main-thread work and 501 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 245 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 94 KiB

    5 images could be 94 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    213 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (213 KiB).

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 20 KiB

    20 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Real visitors wait 4.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.7 s

    21.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Your largest element takes 6.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “a blue circle with the word pir in it.”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 628 ms

    628 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 628 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 179 ms

    179 ms

    Real visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% faster for real visitors

    -32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 353 ms to 235 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors

    -27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.3 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.3 MB in 103 requests

    4.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 103 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (36), images 1.7 MB (21) and stylesheets 340 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.21 g of CO₂e: 144.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 9090
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“2026 .ORG ImpactAwards Winners Announced”, “The First Lap” and “2025 PIR Annual Impact Report”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 10 links with vague text

    10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 72 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 72 pages on pir.org and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “For diverse global communities & individuals who want to do great things online, .ORG is purpose-driven to empower & co…”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “.ORG - Power Your Inspiration. Connect Your World.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pir.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pir.org/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://pir.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (674 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: Looks like your website URL has changed. To ensure the proper functioning of your banner, update the re…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    21 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 487 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 487 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Learn More” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pir.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2002
Headquarters
Reston

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on pir.org, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25