Website review, no card needed
playtex.eu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202637 issues · 85 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on playtex.eu, 17 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #79,306 of 94,771 reviewed websitesbeats 14%
- #45,803 of 50,951 online storesbeats 8%
- #42,164 of 46,074 Shopify storesbeats 7%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 219 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.9 s
3.8 s
5.7 s
7.6 s
9.5 s
11.3 s
13.2 s
15.1 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.2 s
A phone's processor spends 7.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, datadoghq-browser-agent.com and Facebook and others), adding 3.0 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 522 KiB33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (522 KiB).
Improve image delivery
508 KiB15 images could be 508 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
2,826 HTML elements
The page has 2,826 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 265 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Klaviyo adds 126 ms
126 msKlaviyo costs a phone 126 ms of main-thread work and 368 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 37 ms
37 msShopify costs a phone 37 ms of main-thread work and 403 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 67 KiBAbout 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
130 ms · 22 KiB22 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
130 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
57 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 57 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Duplicated JavaScript
19 KiB19 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 83 ms
83 msYour server sent the HTML in 83 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 34.9 s
34.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 34.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s
8.5 sYour largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 7.6 s
7.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.301
0.301The layout shifts by 0.301 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 700 ms
700 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 700 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 229 ms to 219 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 570 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 570 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (124), other files 1.7 MB (362) and images 1.2 MB (53). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images far larger than shown
146 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 0311-encart-maintien-mob.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 146 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (51 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (130 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.86 g of CO₂e: 223.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (1 element)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Summary elements must have discernible text (1 element)
Summary elements must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 132 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
48 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 48 pages on playtex.eu and 21 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 126 characters
Your meta description is 126 characters: “Discover the complete range and sizes of Playtex lingerie, collections of bras, shapewear and bottoms for support and c…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “DIM lingerie and underwear for women and men”.
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “PLAYTEX | Women’s Lingerie, Comfort & Support bras, Shapewear”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.playtex.eu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.playtex.eu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,138 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.playtex.eu/llms.txt (5 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
https://www.playtex.eu/collections/bras has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
2 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 2 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=4029855&Ver=2&mid=21c70dde-5702-4fe8-b3ce-fe224e29a4e3&bo=2&sid=37b96fb0dd9111f191946d6577fbeca8&vid=37b99900dd9111f1bdfdf5c245d64a04&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Gift rule configuration is missing gift tiers or free gift variant ID.”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
35 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 969 words of copy
The homepage carries about 969 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “START SHOPPING” and “Learn More →”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “LEARN MORE!”, “MY ORDER” and “Track My Order”.
6 short forms
6 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, 1 customer or partner logo and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
46 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at playtex.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Judge Me Reviews · Nosto · Addingwell · Helium Customer Fields · Join Stories · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Trevi Wishlist · global-e.com · nfcube.com · baback.co · loyoly.io · Swym Wishlist Plus
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on playtex.eu, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.