Website review, no card needed

poolspaco.com logo

poolspaco.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202618 issues · 74 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on poolspaco.com, 8 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: 7 linked pages are broken. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.3 sJun 13Jul 251.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
269 ms79 msJun 13Jul 25101 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 13, 2026243 ms
Jun 20, 2026247 ms
Jun 27, 2026130 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026120 ms
Jul 18, 2026117 ms
Jul 25, 2026101 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of poolspaco.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. poolspaco.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. poolspaco.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. poolspaco.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. poolspaco.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. poolspaco.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. poolspaco.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. poolspaco.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. poolspaco.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

2 to fix96
  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    349 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (349 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    242 KiB

    6 images could be 242 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    130 ms · 20 KiB

    About 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 130 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    20 KiB

    About 20 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Cloudflare), adding 10 KiB and 12 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 96

    96/100

    Your mobile performance score is 96. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 146 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

7 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 56% faster for real visitors

    -56%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 243 ms to 101 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% faster for real visitors

    -27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the image “Pool Spa Pool Spa Pool Spa Pool Spa Pool Spa Co Pool Spa Co…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.1 s.

Images and page weight

100
  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (178 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (178 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.15 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.15 g of CO₂e: 18.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 557 KiB in 36 requests

    557 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 557 KiB in 36 requests on a phone: images 409 KiB (13), scripts 94 KiB (12) and stylesheets 26 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8791
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (5 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    5 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is short (12 characters)

    Your title is only 12 characters: “Pool Spa Co.”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (301 characters)

    Your meta description is 301 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 25 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 25 pages on poolspaco.com and 18 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “<img src="//poolspaco.com/cdn/shop/files/Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Co_Pool_Spa_Company_Pool_and_Spa_…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://poolspaco.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, Product and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://poolspaco.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://poolspaco.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (902 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix75
  • 7 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://poolspaco.com/pages/pool-spa, https://poolspaco.com/pages/pool-spa-co, https://poolspaco.com/pages/store, https://poolspaco.com/pages/services, https://poolspaco.com/pages/pool-spa-co-com and https://poolspaco.com/pages/usa and 1 other, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 8 internal pages checked

    We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 6 broken images

    6 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://poolspaco.com/cdn/shop/files/Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Pool_Spa_Co_Pool_Spa_Company_Pool_and_Spa_Company_USA_Logo_Pool_Spa_Co_Pool_Spa_Company_Pool_and_Spa_Company_USA_Logo_Pool_Spa_.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 467 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 467 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Subscribe”.

  • 8 short forms

    8 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at poolspaco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on poolspaco.com, including 4 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25