Website review, no card needed

porefavor.com logo

porefavor.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202641 issues · 84 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on porefavor.com, 7 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.3 sMay 23Nov 71.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.6 s
Nov 7, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
213 ms146 msMay 23Nov 7196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026154 ms
May 30, 2026154 ms
Jun 6, 2026162 ms
Jun 13, 2026164 ms
Jun 20, 2026163 ms
Jun 27, 2026163 ms
Jul 4, 2026169 ms
Jul 11, 2026170 ms
Jul 18, 2026178 ms
Jul 25, 2026181 ms
Aug 1, 2026180 ms
Aug 8, 2026181 ms
Aug 15, 2026179 ms
Aug 22, 2026179 ms
Aug 29, 2026181 ms
Sep 5, 2026187 ms
Sep 12, 2026196 ms
Sep 19, 2026203 ms
Sep 26, 2026198 ms
Oct 3, 2026196 ms
Oct 10, 2026199 ms
Oct 17, 2026201 ms
Oct 24, 2026205 ms
Oct 31, 2026205 ms
Nov 7, 2026196 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of porefavor.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. porefavor.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. porefavor.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. porefavor.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. porefavor.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. porefavor.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  6. porefavor.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  7. porefavor.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  8. porefavor.com at 5.5 s5.5 s

Speed

11 to fix82
  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ContentSquare and upstackified.com and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 82

    82/100

    Your mobile performance score is 82. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    626 KiB

    About 626 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    100 ms · 386 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (386 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 274 ms

    274 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 274 ms of main-thread work and 355 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    307 KiB

    10 images could be 307 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 256 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,288 HTML elements

    The page has 2,288 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Shopify adds 70 ms

    70 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 70 ms of main-thread work and 335 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 50 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    19 KiB

    About 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.6 s

    20.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.24

    0.24

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors

    +30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 884 ms

    884 ms

    Real visitors wait 884 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 557 ms

    557 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 557 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 179 ms

    179 ms

    Real visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 41% faster for real visitors

    -41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.2 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Γ”.

Images and page weight

3 to fix60
  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 2.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • Page weight: 3.8 MB in 328 requests

    3.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 328 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (109), other files 933 KiB (149) and images 868 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (2.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (184 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.08 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.08 g of CO₂e: 129.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8993
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 7781
  • Title is long (85 characters)

    Your title is 85 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Acne Supplement: Treats The Root Cause of Acne, Pimples & Blackheads – PORE FAVOR USA”.

  • Meta description is long (257 characters)

    Your meta description is 257 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 38 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 38 pages on porefavor.com and 4 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.porefavor.com/en-us.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.porefavor.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,462 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.porefavor.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    https://www.porefavor.com/en-us and / all use the title “Acne Supplement: Treats The Root Cause of Acne, Pimples & Blackheads …”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/collections/topicals, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/collections/sale and https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/collections/all have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/clear-skin-supplement and https://www.porefavor.com/products/clear-skin-supplement use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://www.porefavor.com/en-us. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/clear-skin-supplement, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/face-wash, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/probiotic-moisturiser, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/collagen and https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/pages/reviews and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    /, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/clear-skin-supplement, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/face-wash, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/probiotic-moisturiser, https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/products/collagen and https://www.porefavor.com/en-us/pages/reviews and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9276
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97151904&Ver=2&mid=0b1ab4e6-7447-429e-897e-ecaeb24b8750&bo=1&sid=3117d600dc1611f18665a7bcacd29682&vid=3117f880dc1611f1ae0cf9d3584228d3&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'top')”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 682 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 682 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Try Today”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Shop All” and “Shop All Products”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 39 testimonial or review blocks, 2 customer or partner logos, 4 trust badges and “3,000+ REVIEWS”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 30 cookies set on arrival

    30

    Opening the homepage sets 30 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 50 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 50 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at porefavor.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 19 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Triplewhale · Uppromote Affiliate · Lucky Orange · Sc Easy Redirects · Convert Experiences · Geoip Country Redirect · Contentsquare Analytics · Upstack Data Tracking Pixel · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Convert Web Pixel · Affliate By Secomapp · Avada Estimated Delivery Date · cloudfront.net · rechargecdn.com · electricsms.com · bogos.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on porefavor.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25