Website review, no card needed

portauthority.org logo

portauthority.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202640 issues · 86 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on portauthority.org, 20 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.3 sMay 2Oct 171.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.4 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
159 ms81 msMay 2Oct 17144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202690 ms
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 2026102 ms
May 23, 2026110 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026130 ms
Jun 13, 2026144 ms
Jun 20, 2026150 ms
Jun 27, 2026149 ms
Jul 4, 2026145 ms
Jul 11, 2026127 ms
Jul 18, 2026117 ms
Jul 25, 2026123 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026139 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026120 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026124 ms
Sep 12, 2026139 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026139 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026137 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of portauthority.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. portauthority.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. portauthority.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. portauthority.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. portauthority.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. portauthority.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. portauthority.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. portauthority.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. portauthority.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix37
  • Improve image delivery

    9.2 s · 4.1 MB

    15 images could be 4.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    9.7 s · 3.1 MB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    12.0 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 12.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.8 s · 1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.1 s · 429 KiB

    About 429 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 38). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (kendostatic.com, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.8 MB and 802 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify JavaScript

    750 ms · 156 KiB

    156 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 807 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • kendostatic.com adds 589 ms

    589 ms

    kendostatic.com costs a phone 589 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    450 ms · 91 KiB

    91 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 342 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 67 ms

    67 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 67 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 15.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.0 s

    24.0 s

    Your largest element takes 24.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Connecting Communities”.

  • Speed Index: 15.2 s

    15.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.0 s

    24.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 757 ms

    757 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 757 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 52% slower for real visitors

    +52%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 90 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 175 ms

    175 ms

    Real visitors wait 175 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 695 ms

    695 ms

    Real visitors wait 695 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix28
  • Page weight: 7.3 MB in 38 requests

    7.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 38 requests on a phone: images 4.6 MB (22), scripts 2.2 MB (10) and stylesheets 460 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (4.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 13 images below the first screen load straight away

    13 images further down the page (4.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    379 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example inclineclouds.png at 1,000 px wide, shown at 300 px. Resized copies would save about 379 KiB.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.07 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.07 g of CO₂e: 248.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7887
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (15 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 8 form fields without a label

    8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (15 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10090
  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Pittsburgh Regional Transit”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 74 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 74 pages on portauthority.org and 11 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Pittsburgh Regional Transit - Your trusted public transportation system serving the Pittsburgh metropolitan area with b…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Contact Us”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://rideprt.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rideprt.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://rideprt.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and description; sameAs (social profiles) and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,098 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://rideprt.org/Services, https://rideprt.org/fares-and-payment, https://rideprt.org/about-us, https://rideprt.org/contact-us, https://rideprt.org/Services/plan-your-trip and https://rideprt.org/Services/system-map and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://rideprt.org/service-alerts-and-updates took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Proxima+Nova:wght@400;700&display=swap' from orig…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 958 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 958 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “View Schedule”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “View Schedule” and “Learn More About Careers at PRT”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at portauthority.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Founded
1964
Headquarters
Pittsburgh

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on portauthority.org, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25