Website review, no card needed

processmaker.com logo

processmaker.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202629 issues · 85 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on processmaker.com, 8 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.1 s2.3 sMay 16Oct 312.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.3 s
May 23, 20264.4 s
May 30, 20264.7 s
Jun 6, 20264.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
223 ms155 msMay 16Oct 31164 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026214 ms
May 23, 2026215 ms
May 30, 2026215 ms
Jun 6, 2026173 ms
Jun 13, 2026195 ms
Jun 20, 2026196 ms
Jun 27, 2026192 ms
Jul 4, 2026197 ms
Jul 11, 2026181 ms
Jul 18, 2026176 ms
Jul 25, 2026178 ms
Aug 1, 2026190 ms
Aug 8, 2026192 ms
Aug 15, 2026194 ms
Aug 22, 2026203 ms
Aug 29, 2026190 ms
Sep 5, 2026183 ms
Sep 12, 2026188 ms
Sep 19, 2026176 ms
Sep 26, 2026166 ms
Oct 3, 2026174 ms
Oct 10, 2026163 ms
Oct 17, 2026163 ms
Oct 24, 2026172 ms
Oct 31, 2026164 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of processmaker.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. processmaker.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. processmaker.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. processmaker.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. processmaker.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. processmaker.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. processmaker.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. processmaker.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. processmaker.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

processmaker.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

4 to fix75
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 358 KiB

    About 358 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    912 KiB

    2 images could be 912 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Hubspot and others), adding 389 KiB and 337 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    124 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (124 KiB).

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 899 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    Your largest element takes 6.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Decisions platform hero”.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.1 s

    9.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 209 ms

    209 ms

    Real visitors wait 209 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.11

    0.11

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 22% faster for real visitors

    -22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 214 ms to 164 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 39% faster for real visitors

    -39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 68 ms

    68 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 68 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix0
  • Page weight: 11.7 MB in 116 requests

    11.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.7 MB in 116 requests on a phone: images 7.1 MB (52), media 3.4 MB (1) and scripts 1,012 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.31 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.31 g of CO₂e: 396.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fix81
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 52 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9286
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 39 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 39 pages on processmaker.com and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Orchestrate instantly. Innovate endlessly.”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “AI and Process Automation Platform | Decisions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://decisions.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://decisions.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (7 KiB, 54 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /customer-overview, /enterprise-pricing, /privacy-policy and /terms have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /privacy-policy, /terms and /security-compliance have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 console errors

    3 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 (Forbidden)”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://processmaker.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://decisions.com/schedule-demo/.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (decisions.com).

  • Valid certificate (62 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for processmaker.com and is valid for another 62 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://processmaker.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 39 links work

    All 39 links checked from your homepage (34 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    decisions.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    decisions.com was registered in Sep 1998 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only digicert.com, godaddy.com, letsencrypt.org and comodoca.com to issue certificates for decisions.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Sep 2028

    decisions.com is registered until Sep 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,135 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,135 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Pricing” and “Get a Demo”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:ip4txt.processmaker.…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Hiring

Hiring
15 open roles
Teams
Product Team (7), Technology Team (4), Sales Team (2), General Administration Team (1)
Job board
rippling

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on processmaker.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25