Website review, no card needed
prodigiosovolcan.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202638 issues · 83 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on prodigiosovolcan.com, 17 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 133 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.8 s
2.7 s
3.6 s
4.5 s
5.5 s
6.4 s
7.3 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
15.8 s · 4.0 MB4 images could be 4.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 15.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 453 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (453 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.2 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 207 KiBAbout 207 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
3,913 HTML elements
The page has 3,913 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Main-thread work: 3.8 s
A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 311 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager), adding 288 KiB and 123 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 104 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
25 KiBAbout 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 105 ms
105 msYour server sent the HTML in 105 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.1 s
25.1 sYour largest element takes 25.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Las cookies de la web se usan para personalizar el contenid…”.
Time to Interactive: 25.2 s
25.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Speed Index: 4.7 s
4.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user INP: 181 ms
181 msReal visitors wait 181 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 477 ms
477 msReal visitors wait 477 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 144 ms to 133 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 110 ms
110 msScripts block the page for only 110 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 64.9 MB in 54 requests
64.9 MBYour homepage downloads 64.9 MB in 54 requests on a phone: media 59.5 MB (23), images 4.5 MB (10) and scripts 479 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
20260506_PRODIGIOS_GIFClaraWeb_800x800.gif weighs 3.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
1.8 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20260506_PRODIGIOS_GIFClaraWeb_800x800.gif at 800 px wide, shown at 190 px. Resized copies would save about 1.8 MB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (3.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (389 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 18.4 g of CO₂ per visit
18.39 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 18.39 g of CO₂e: 2206.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (70 characters)
Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Prodigioso Volcán - Nos encantan las buenas ideas y los nuevos medios.”.
Meta description is short (50 characters)
Your meta description is only 50 characters: “Nos encantan las buenas ideas y los nuevos medios.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
28 H1 headlines
There are 28 <h1> headlines (“¿Carpeta ciudadana o mochila ciudadana?”, “VIEJO MADRID” and “¿Qué dice de ti la IA?”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at prodigiosovolcan.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
62 internal links, 75 external
The homepage links to 62 pages on prodigiosovolcan.com and 75 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,999 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/seccion/proyectos, https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/seccion/informes, https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/pv/marcas, https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/pv/sostenibilidad and https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/pv/voz-y-audio have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/pv/marcas and https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/pv/formacion have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.prodigiosovolcan.com/pv/metodologia-sapiens has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 40 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
28 small tap targets
28 of 51 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 45 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 3,022 words of copy
The homepage carries about 3,022 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at prodigiosovolcan.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- OVHcloud
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on prodigiosovolcan.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.