Website review, no card needed
proreferees.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202631 issues · 97 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on proreferees.com, 9 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 500 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 521 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 519 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 525 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 542 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 552 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 641 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 672 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 677 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 663 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 580 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 564 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 548 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 543 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 543 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 505 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 517 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 499 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 508 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 524 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 497 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 501 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 478 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 493 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 482 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 54 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 54 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 58 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 58 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 63 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 63 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 62 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 62 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 56 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 56 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 55 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 56 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 55 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 54 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 59 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 56 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 57 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 55 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 872 KiB10 images could be 872 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 65
65/100Your mobile performance score is 65. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 30 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (30 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 22 KiBAbout 22 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 13 KiBAbout 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (GoDaddy, Tencent and Google Fonts and others), adding 190 KiB and 114 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 110 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Speed Index: 13.4 s
13.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.1 s
7.1 sYour largest element takes 7.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “2025/26 Gainbridge Super League ball”.
Time to Interactive: 7.2 s
7.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
34 images without width and height
34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 54 ms to 55 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.5 s to 0.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.6 s
0.6 sReal visitors wait 0.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 83 ms
83 msReal visitors wait 83 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.5 s
0.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 265 ms
265 msReal visitors wait 265 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 82 ms
82 msScripts block the page for only 82 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
PRO-Web-2026USLballv2-800x450-1-768x432.png weighs 625 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
PRO-Web-2026USLballv2-800x450-1-768x432.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
5 images in older formats
5 images (936 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.38 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.38 g of CO₂e: 45.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.3 MB in 54 requests
1.3 MBYour homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 54 requests on a phone: images 1,018 KiB (12), fonts 148 KiB (4) and scripts 122 KiB (11). That is a lean page.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
19 text elements with low contrast
19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 74 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (17 characters)
Your title is only 17 characters: “> Leading the way”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
215 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 215 pages on proreferees.com and 3 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “> Leading the way”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://proreferees.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (935 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
/about-pro/mission-statement, /roster/support-staff, /careers, /roster/referees-2, /roster/assistant-referees and /roster/video-assistant-referees and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 small tap targets
12 of 49 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 (Forbidden)”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (proreferees.com).
Valid certificate (33 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for proreferees.com and is valid for another 33 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://proreferees.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 43 links work
All 43 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 3 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
proreferees.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
proreferees.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 14 years old
14 yearsproreferees.com was registered in Dec 2011 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Dec 2033
proreferees.com is registered until Dec 2033.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 12 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 710 words of copy
The homepage carries about 710 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Respect the Call” and “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:66.159.248.77 include:spf-0022f401.pphosted.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
Company
- Founded
- 2012
- Headquarters
- New York City
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on proreferees.com, including 9 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.