Website review, no card needed

prosenectute.ch logo

prosenectute.ch website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202632 issues · 80 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on prosenectute.ch, 5 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s863 msMay 9Oct 24906 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 2026880 ms
May 16, 2026887 ms
May 23, 2026899 ms
May 30, 2026908 ms
Jun 6, 2026903 ms
Jun 13, 2026912 ms
Jun 20, 2026948 ms
Jun 27, 2026978 ms
Jul 4, 2026995 ms
Jul 11, 2026995 ms
Jul 18, 2026971 ms
Jul 25, 2026948 ms
Aug 1, 2026952 ms
Aug 8, 2026977 ms
Aug 15, 2026972 ms
Aug 22, 2026977 ms
Aug 29, 2026979 ms
Sep 5, 2026971 ms
Sep 12, 2026985 ms
Sep 19, 2026980 ms
Sep 26, 2026977 ms
Oct 3, 2026962 ms
Oct 10, 2026953 ms
Oct 17, 2026938 ms
Oct 24, 2026906 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
115 ms109 msMay 9Oct 24112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026114 ms
May 16, 2026113 ms
May 23, 2026114 ms
May 30, 2026113 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026113 ms
Jul 11, 2026113 ms
Jul 18, 2026113 ms
Jul 25, 2026112 ms
Aug 1, 2026112 ms
Aug 8, 2026112 ms
Aug 15, 2026111 ms
Aug 22, 2026112 ms
Aug 29, 2026112 ms
Sep 5, 2026110 ms
Sep 12, 2026111 ms
Sep 19, 2026111 ms
Sep 26, 2026112 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of prosenectute.ch (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. prosenectute.ch at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. prosenectute.ch at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. prosenectute.ch at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. prosenectute.ch at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. prosenectute.ch at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. prosenectute.ch at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. prosenectute.ch at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. prosenectute.ch at 4.2 s4.2 s

Speed

5 to fix55
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 588 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (588 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 160 KiB

    About 160 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,525 HTML elements

    The page has 1,525 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 245 KiB

    5 images could be 245 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    250 ms · 7 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 38 KiB

    About 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (azurestaticapps.net, Cloudflare CDN and Ipify), adding 270 KiB and 112 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 62 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 157 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 106 ms

    106 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 106 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.001

    1.001

    The layout shifts by 1.001 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Zwei ältere Personen beim wandern.”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 114 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 329 ms

    329 ms

    Real visitors wait 329 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 12 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix74
  • Page weight: 2.0 MB in 46 requests

    2.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 46 requests on a phone: images 1.5 MB (16), scripts 379 KiB (20) and stylesheets 51 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    PS_Slider_Digitaler_Nachlas_2800x1000px_1.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    85 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example ZEWO_Claim_Footer.png at 3,000 px wide, shown at 293 px. Resized copies would save about 85 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (93 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.57 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.57 g of CO₂e: 68.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9794
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9279
  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “Pro Senectute Schweiz”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Beziehungen im Alter”, “Niemand will alleine alt werden...” and “So regeln Sie Ihr digitales Erbe”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 204 internal links, 58 external

    The homepage links to 204 pages on prosenectute.ch and 58 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Wir sind die grösste Fach- und Dienstleistungsorganisation für das Alter in der Schweiz. Nutzen Sie unser Angebot in Ih…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.prosenectute.ch/de.html.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.prosenectute.ch/pro-senectute/de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.prosenectute.ch/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (832 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.prosenectute.ch/de.html and / all use the title “Pro Senectute Schweiz”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.prosenectute.ch/de/suche.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://www.prosenectute.ch/de.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    / and https://www.prosenectute.ch/de/ratgeber/wohnen.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 159 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to fetch at 'https://ashy-ocean-0ddefcb03.7.azurestaticapps.net/maintenance.json' from origin 'https://www.prose…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 535 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 535 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Shop”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at prosenectute.ch, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Powered by Magnolia - Intuitive Opensource CMS
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Hosting
Mironet

Company

Founded
1917

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on prosenectute.ch, including 10 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25