Website review, no card needed

protectionunit.com logo

protectionunit.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202636 issues · 83 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on protectionunit.com, 13 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 30.8 MB in 149 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.7 s2.7 sMay 16Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20266.2 s
May 23, 20265.5 s
May 30, 20265.5 s
Jun 6, 20265.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.8 s
Jun 20, 20264.5 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.8 s
Oct 24, 20263.7 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
118 ms101 msMay 16Oct 31106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026116 ms
May 23, 2026112 ms
May 30, 2026112 ms
Jun 6, 2026112 ms
Jun 13, 2026111 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026112 ms
Jul 4, 2026106 ms
Jul 11, 2026109 ms
Jul 18, 2026105 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026106 ms
Aug 29, 2026103 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026106 ms
Sep 26, 2026107 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms
Oct 10, 2026110 ms
Oct 17, 2026110 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms
Oct 31, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of protectionunit.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. protectionunit.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. protectionunit.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. protectionunit.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. protectionunit.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. protectionunit.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. protectionunit.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. protectionunit.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. protectionunit.com at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

10 to fix69
  • Font display

    2.9 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.9 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    51 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    22.8 MB

    21 images could be 22.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Facebook and others), adding 1.3 MB and 966 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 69

    69/100

    Your mobile performance score is 69. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 174 KiB

    About 174 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    605 KiB

    About 605 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 408 ms

    408 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 408 ms of main-thread work and 966 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Cookiebot adds 378 ms

    378 ms

    Cookiebot costs a phone 378 ms of main-thread work and 32 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 235 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    223 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (223 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    31 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 31 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 108 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Real visitors wait 4.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 2.00

    2.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 2.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 20.7 s

    20.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 20.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 50.2 s

    50.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 50.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Your largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PROTECTION UNIT, VOTRE SOCIÉTÉ DE GARDIENNAGE EN BELGIQUE”. Most of its time is element render delay (5.6 s).

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 256 ms

    256 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 256 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 116 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Real visitors wait 108 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 41% faster for real visitors

    -41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 30.8 MB in 149 requests

    30.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 30.8 MB in 149 requests on a phone: images 24.8 MB (32), media 3.1 MB (1) and scripts 2.2 MB (71). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (658 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 8.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.74 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.74 g of CO₂e: 1049.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 21 text elements with low contrast

    21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • [aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

    [aria-*] attributes do not have valid values (1 element).

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Entreprise de sécurité et gardiennage en Belgique | Protection Unit”.

  • 102 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 102 pages on protectionunit.com and 19 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Protection UNIT est une société 100% belge active dans le secteur de la sécurité et du gardiennage. Nous disposons auss…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Protection UNIT, votre société de gardiennage en Belgique”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.protectionunit.com/fr/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.protectionunit.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.protectionunit.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,008 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.protectionunit.com/espace-securise is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.protectionunit.com/espace-securise and https://www.protectionunit.com/fr/actualite/united-post have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.protectionunit.com/fr/qui-sommes-nous/secteurs-dactivites and https://www.protectionunit.com/fr/qui-sommes-nous/qualite use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.protectionunit.com/contact has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.protectionunit.com/fr/qui-sommes-nous/vision-mission-valeurs took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 819 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 819 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at protectionunit.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on protectionunit.com, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25