Website review, no card needed
qarshi.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202647 issues · 86 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on qarshi.com, 22 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 8.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 9.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 9.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 10.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 10.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 10.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 10.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 9.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 7.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 7.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 8.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 8.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 160 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
25.3 s · 6.7 MB71 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.7 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
18.7 s · 3.3 MBAbout 3.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 18.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
5.1 s · 858 KiBAbout 858 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.9 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.9 s.
Improve image delivery
2.4 s · 1.0 MB12 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Font display
2.3 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.3 s).
Minify JavaScript
1.5 s · 308 KiB308 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
YouTube adds 1.2 s
1.2 sYouTube costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 2.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.4 s
A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Google Maps and others), adding 3.6 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
640 ms · 126 KiB126 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 30 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
95 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 344 ms
344 msYour server sent the HTML in 344 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 9.7 s
9.7 sReal visitors wait 9.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 6.3 s
6.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 49.4 s
49.4 sYour largest element takes 49.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 25.1 s
25.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 25.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 57.2 s
57.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 57.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.6 s
7.6 sThe first text or image appears after 7.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 205 ms
205 msReal visitors wait 205 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.20
0.20For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.20 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.198
0.198The layout shifts by 0.198 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 407 ms
407 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 407 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.9 s to 8.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.9 MB in 141 requests
10.9 MBYour homepage downloads 10.9 MB in 141 requests on a phone: scripts 5.8 MB (57), images 3.1 MB (24) and stylesheets 936 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images in older formats
6 images (823 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (633 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
134 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example home-project-section-uni-img.jpg at 1,500 px wide, shown at 343 px. Resized copies would save about 134 KiB.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.08 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.08 g of CO₂e: 370.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
25 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 30 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 25 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“AboutQarshi”, “QARSHI Organization” and “Projects”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (354 characters)
Your meta description is 354 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
38 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 38 pages on qarshi.com and 12 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Home - Qarshi Industries (Pvt) Ltd.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://qarshi.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://qarshi.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://qarshi.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (277 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://qarshi.com/claim-your-free-10.html, https://qarshi.com/elevating-the-game-stake.html, https://qarshi.com/experience-the-excitement-of.html, https://qarshi.com/fresh-kazino-luchshiy-igrovoy.html, https://qarshi.com/issleduyte-mir-mostbet.html and https://qarshi.com/issleduyte-mir-pin-Up.html and 1 other, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
8 pages share a meta description
https://qarshi.com/about, https://qarshi.com/qarshi-organization, https://qarshi.com/corporate-social-responsibility, https://qarshi.com/quest-for-quality, https://qarshi.com/international-presence and https://qarshi.com/local-presence and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
https://qarshi.com/international-presence and https://qarshi.com/local-presence have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://qarshi.com/quest-for-quality and https://qarshi.com/local-presence have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 222 words
The homepage has only about 222 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Shop”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Shop”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qarshi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Hetzner
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on qarshi.com, including 25 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.