Website review, no card needed

qfix.com logo

qfix.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202634 issues · 83 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on qfix.com, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
7.3 s2.8 sApr 25Oct 103.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.8 s
May 2, 20263.8 s
May 9, 20264.0 s
May 16, 20264.2 s
May 23, 20264.2 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20266.1 s
Jun 13, 20266.3 s
Jun 20, 20266.5 s
Jun 27, 20266.5 s
Jul 4, 20266.5 s
Jul 11, 20266.8 s
Jul 18, 20265.7 s
Jul 25, 20265.1 s
Aug 1, 20264.4 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20264.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms86 msApr 25Oct 10106 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202696 ms
May 2, 202698 ms
May 9, 2026105 ms
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026108 ms
May 30, 2026107 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026132 ms
Jun 20, 2026133 ms
Jun 27, 2026134 ms
Jul 4, 2026132 ms
Jul 11, 2026124 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 202699 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202692 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026104 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026100 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202699 ms
Oct 3, 2026105 ms
Oct 10, 2026106 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qfix.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qfix.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. qfix.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. qfix.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. qfix.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. qfix.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  6. qfix.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  7. qfix.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  8. qfix.com at 5.3 s5.3 s

Speed

10 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 387 KiB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (387 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 1.8 MB

    15 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 59). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 541 KiB

    About 541 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and cookiepro.com and others), adding 1.7 MB and 624 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 218 KiB

    About 218 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 329 ms

    329 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 329 ms of main-thread work and 527 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 80 ms

    80 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 80 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • FontAwesome CDN adds 34 ms

    34 ms

    FontAwesome CDN costs a phone 34 ms of main-thread work and 434 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 154 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 821 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “pause video Innovative Patient Positioning Explore Products”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 106 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Real visitors wait 110 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 153 ms

    153 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 153 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.039

    0.039

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.039, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 110 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 110 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (25), scripts 1.3 MB (36) and fonts 497 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Slider_LDRT_1200x800.jpg weighs 632 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    309 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Slider_LDRT_1200x800.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 309 KiB.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10077
  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Home | CQ Medical”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (302 characters)

    Your meta description is 302 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 119 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 119 pages on qfix.com and 9 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Innovative Patient Positioning”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://cqmedical.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://cqmedical.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (458 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://cqmedical.com/CQM all use the title “Home | CQ Medical”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    35 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 463 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 463 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Contact Us” and “Request IFU Translations”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qfix.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Titan CMS 7.5.10.0
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
2003

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on qfix.com, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25