Website review, no card needed
qentrega.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202635 issues · 79 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on qentrega.com.br, 15 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 188 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.2 s
3.3 s
4.4 s
5.5 s
6.6 s
7.7 s
8.8 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.6 s53 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 963 KiB4 images could be 963 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
800 ms · 3.0 MB105 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64 (desktop: 89). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 124 KiBAbout 124 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 37 KiBAbout 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Jivochat), adding 181 KiB and 96 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 56 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 89 but mobile only 64. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 583 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 246 ms
246 msYour server sent the HTML in 246 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.3 s
15.3 sYour largest element takes 15.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “IMG_home3 (1)”.
Time to Interactive: 15.7 s
15.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.9 s
9.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 11 ms
11 msScripts block the page for only 11 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.1 MB in 114 requests
6.1 MBYour homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 114 requests on a phone: media 2.7 MB (1), images 2.1 MB (13) and fonts 689 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
IMG_2.webp weighs 569 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
249 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example IMG_home3-1.webp at 1,400 px wide, shown at 356 px. Resized copies would save about 249 KiB.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.73 g of CO₂e: 208.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
37 text elements with low contrast
37 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (52 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 52 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
51 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 51 pages on qentrega.com.br and 8 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “QEntrega – Entrega inteligente em 24 horas”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://qentrega.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://qentrega.com.br/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,244 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://qentrega.com.br/llms.txt (1 KiB, 2 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
9 pages without a meta description
https://qentrega.com.br/institucional, https://qentrega.com.br/entregar, https://qentrega.com.br/blog-qe, https://qentrega.com.br/contato, https://qentrega.com.br/trabalhe-conosco and https://qentrega.com.br/entrega-de-produtos-farmaceuticos-com-transporte-refrigerado-seguranca-qualidade-e-eficiencia-para-o-setor and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://qentrega.com.br/institucional, https://qentrega.com.br/entregar, https://qentrega.com.br/blog-qe, https://qentrega.com.br/contato, https://qentrega.com.br/trabalhe-conosco and https://qentrega.com.br/entrega-de-produtos-farmaceuticos-com-transporte-refrigerado-seguranca-qualidade-e-eficiencia-para-o-setor and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://crmeme.com.br/clientes-meme/rsm/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/WhatsApp-Image-2024-07-17-at-11.20.20-1.png.
3 small tap targets
3 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 24 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 762 words of copy
The homepage carries about 762 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qentrega.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Hostinger
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on qentrega.com.br, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.