Website review, no card needed

qima.pl logo

qima.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202641 issues · 83 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on qima.pl, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: google Tag Manager adds 2.1 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.0 sMay 23Nov 73.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Oct 31, 20263.1 s
Nov 7, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
372 ms177 msMay 23Nov 7349 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026203 ms
May 30, 2026199 ms
Jun 6, 2026205 ms
Jun 13, 2026212 ms
Jun 20, 2026211 ms
Jun 27, 2026217 ms
Jul 4, 2026219 ms
Jul 11, 2026217 ms
Jul 18, 2026217 ms
Jul 25, 2026215 ms
Aug 1, 2026225 ms
Aug 8, 2026243 ms
Aug 15, 2026259 ms
Aug 22, 2026282 ms
Aug 29, 2026294 ms
Sep 5, 2026301 ms
Sep 12, 2026304 ms
Sep 19, 2026306 ms
Sep 26, 2026302 ms
Oct 3, 2026305 ms
Oct 10, 2026308 ms
Oct 17, 2026296 ms
Oct 24, 2026307 ms
Oct 31, 2026342 ms
Nov 7, 2026349 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qima.pl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qima.pl at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. qima.pl at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. qima.pl at 3.8 s3.8 s
  4. qima.pl at 5.0 s5.0 s
  5. qima.pl at 6.3 s6.3 s
  6. qima.pl at 7.6 s7.6 s
  7. qima.pl at 8.8 s8.8 s
  8. qima.pl at 10.1 s10.1 s

Speed

10 to fix40
  • Google Tag Manager adds 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 2.1 s of main-thread work and 702 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 10.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 8.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 40

    40/100

    Your mobile performance score is 40. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, PageSense and Cookiebot and others), adding 1,019 KiB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 949 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    918 KiB

    13 images could be 918 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 495 KiB

    About 495 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • PageSense adds 545 ms

    545 ms

    PageSense costs a phone 545 ms of main-thread work and 123 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,680 HTML elements

    The page has 2,680 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 37 KiB

    About 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 14 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    46 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (46 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.4 s

    18.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Your largest element takes 7.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Child delighted with a safety-tested teddy bear”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 309 ms

    309 ms

    Real visitors wait 309 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 72% slower for real visitors

    +72%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 203 ms to 349 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 45% slower for real visitors

    +45%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 978 ms

    978 ms

    Real visitors wait 978 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix48
  • 7 images far larger than shown

    621 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example insight-platform.jpg at 1,400 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 621 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 85 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 85 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (26), scripts 1.4 MB (24) and fonts 214 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    HP_Food_Cookie_Consumer.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (1,016 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.00 g of CO₂e: 120.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8690
  • 18 text elements with low contrast

    18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8584
  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “QIMA Home | QIMA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 88 internal links, 44 external

    The homepage links to 88 pages on qima.pl and 44 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 75 characters

    Your meta description is 75 characters: “Quality control, supply chain audits, and certification services from QIMA.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We help youmake productsconsumers can trust”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.qima.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.qima.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.qima.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,027 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to execute 'appendChild' on 'Node': Unexpected token ':' https://www.qima.com/_next/static/chunks/097a1ruscz2hy.…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    17 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 719 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 719 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Talk to an expert”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Talk to an expert”, “Get a quote →” and “Talk to an expert →”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 32 testimonial or review blocks, 6 customer or partner logos and “30,000 + Businesses”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qima.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
CloudFront

Hiring

Hiring
730 open roles
Teams
Inspection (34), Audit Services (12), Lab Testing (10), Finance (9)
Job board
smartrecruiters

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on qima.pl, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25