Website review, no card needed

qintesi.com logo

qintesi.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202633 issues · 80 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on qintesi.com, 17 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.9 s3.7 sMay 16Oct 314.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.9 s
May 23, 20264.8 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.8 s
Jun 13, 20264.3 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.9 s
Jul 18, 20265.3 s
Jul 25, 20265.7 s
Aug 1, 20265.5 s
Aug 8, 20265.0 s
Aug 15, 20264.9 s
Sep 19, 20264.0 s
Sep 26, 20264.0 s
Oct 3, 20264.4 s
Oct 10, 20264.3 s
Oct 17, 20264.3 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Oct 31, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
124 ms98 msMay 16Oct 31117 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026121 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026105 ms
Jun 6, 2026115 ms
Jun 13, 2026119 ms
Jun 20, 2026115 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026110 ms
Jul 11, 2026108 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026117 ms
Aug 1, 2026112 ms
Aug 8, 2026107 ms
Aug 15, 2026117 ms
Sep 26, 2026101 ms
Oct 3, 2026102 ms
Oct 10, 2026107 ms
Oct 17, 2026114 ms
Oct 24, 2026116 ms
Oct 31, 2026117 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qintesi.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qintesi.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. qintesi.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. qintesi.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. qintesi.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. qintesi.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. qintesi.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. qintesi.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  8. qintesi.com at 7.5 s7.5 s

Speed

7 to fix59
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.2 s

    64 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.2 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 313 KiB

    About 313 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 187 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (187 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 119 ms

    119 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 119 ms of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and cdn-cookieyes.com and others), adding 839 KiB and 343 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 69 KiB

    6 images could be 69 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 108 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    48 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 48 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    20 ms · 18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    20 ms · 12 KiB

    About 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 20 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 221 ms

    221 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 221 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    Your largest element takes 12.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 24 images without width and height

    24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 212 ms

    212 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 212 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 117 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Real visitors wait 117 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.9 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB in 166 requests

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB in 166 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (37), images 802 KiB (40) and fonts 399 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (86 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.68 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.68 g of CO₂e: 82.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8390
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 15 tap targets too small

    15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 13 images without alt text

    13 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Meta description is short (64 characters)

    Your meta description is only 64 characters: “System Integrator & Consulting, SAP Gold e Google Cloud Partner.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 143 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 143 pages on qintesi.com and 8 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Modelli di sostenibilità”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Qintesi - People shaping solutions.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.qintesi.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.qintesi.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.qintesi.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,067 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix80
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.qintesi.com/en declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    https://www.qintesi.com/chi-siamo/qintesi, https://www.qintesi.com/chi-siamo/governance, https://www.qintesi.com/chi-siamo/sostenibilita-e-impegno-sociale, https://www.qintesi.com/chi-siamo/network, https://www.qintesi.com/en and https://www.qintesi.com/servizi/digital-transformation and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.qintesi.com/chi-siamo/qintesi, https://www.qintesi.com/chi-siamo/governance, https://www.qintesi.com/chi-siamo/partnership, https://www.qintesi.com/contatti and https://www.qintesi.com/en have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 16 small tap targets

    16 of 46 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 856 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 856 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qintesi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Servereasy Srl

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on qintesi.com, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25