Website review, no card needed
qrm.fr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202647 issues · 90 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on qrm.fr, 19 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 219 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 205 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 204 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 168 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9.8 s · 10.0 MB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.0 MB).
Improve image delivery
3.5 s · 6.3 MB6 images could be 6.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.3 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.1 s · 500 KiBAbout 500 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google CDN and Unpkg and others), adding 1.5 MB and 559 ms of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 429 ms
429 msYouTube costs a phone 429 ms of main-thread work and 992 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,831 HTML elements
The page has 1,831 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google CDN adds 82 ms
82 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 82 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 138 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
30 KiB30 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 80 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
8 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 298 ms
298 msYour server sent the HTML in 298 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.1 s
16.1 sYour largest element takes 16.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 20.9 s
20.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sThe first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.7 s
7.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 344 ms
344 msReal visitors wait 344 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 42% slower for real visitors
+42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 298 ms
298 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 298 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 219 ms to 168 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.8 MB in 67 requests
11.8 MBYour homepage downloads 11.8 MB in 67 requests on a phone: images 9.0 MB (13), scripts 1.8 MB (20) and stylesheets 471 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (278 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.33 g of CO₂e: 399.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
14 tap targets too small
14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (32 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
153 internal links, 113 external
The homepage links to 153 pages on qrm.fr and 113 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “Toute l’actualité des Rouge et Jaune et plus encore : articles quotidiens, billetterie, boutique, calendrier/résultats …”.
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Site Officiel de QRM - Quevilly Rouen Métropole”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://qrm.fr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://qrm.fr/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://qrm.fr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,262 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://qrm.fr/calendrier-classement has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://qrm.fr/octobre-le-mois-des-belles-causes-%f0%9f%ab%b6, whose canonical is https://qrm.fr/octobre-le-mois-des-belles-causes-%F0%9F%AB%B6. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
7 pages without an H1
https://qrm.fr/qrm/stades, https://qrm.fr/qrm/supporters, https://qrm.fr/qrm/partenaires-qui-sont-ils, https://qrm.fr/qrm/partenaires-matmut-x-qrm, https://qrm.fr/qrm/un-club-engage and https://qrm.fr/qrm/contact and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 54 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'indexOf')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 542 words of copy
The homepage carries about 542 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qrm.fr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
Company
- Founded
- 1902
- Headquarters
- Le Petit-Quevilly
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on qrm.fr, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.