Website review, no card needed

qprime.com logo

qprime.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202623 issues · 68 checks

This review found 23 issues worth fixing on qprime.com, 7 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s1.8 sMay 16Oct 313.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.2 s
Oct 31, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms65 msJun 6Oct 3196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 6, 202670 ms
Jun 13, 202669 ms
Jun 20, 202675 ms
Jun 27, 202680 ms
Aug 15, 202676 ms
Aug 22, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202693 ms
Sep 26, 202693 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms
Oct 31, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of qprime.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. qprime.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. qprime.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. qprime.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. qprime.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. qprime.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. qprime.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. qprime.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. qprime.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

5 to fix80
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 1.1 MB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 787 KiB

    12 images could be 787 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 80

    80/100

    Your mobile performance score is 80. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    550 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 69 KiB

    About 69 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 157 KiB and 130 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 90 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 121 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 26 ms

    26 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 26 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Your largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Q Prime”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.1 s).

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 38% slower for real visitors

    +38%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 48% slower for real visitors

    +48%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 53 ms

    53 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 53 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (576 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.36 g of CO₂e: 42.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 25 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 25 requests on a phone: images 1.0 MB (13), scripts 180 KiB (7) and fonts 37 KiB (1). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

Google 100100
2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 39 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10098
  • Only 3 internal links

    The homepage links to only 3 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 109 characters

    Your meta description is 109 characters: “Q Prime Management is an artist management company with offices in New York, the UK, Nashville and Australia.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Q Prime Management – Artist Management”.

  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Q Prime Management | Artist Management”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://qprime.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://qprime.com/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://qprime.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and description; sameAs (social profiles) and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (201 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://qprime.com/academia has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 internal page checked

    We fetched 1 page linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 1 page we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 201 words

    The homepage has only about 201 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 5 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qprime.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Oracle Cloud

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 23 issues on qprime.com, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25