Website review, no card needed
qu.edu.qa website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202659 issues · 92 checks
This review found 59 issues worth fixing on qu.edu.qa, 28 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
56FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 141 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.3 s
4.5 s
6.8 s
9.0 s
11.3 s
13.6 s
15.8 s
18.1 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
14.3 s · 18.5 MB31 images could be 18.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
6.7 s50 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.7 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.5 s · 967 KiBAbout 967 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 196 KiBAbout 196 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.4 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.4 s).
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.9 s
A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (ContentSquare, Google Tag Manager and ally.ac and others), adding 610 KiB and 699 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 121 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 121 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
ContentSquare adds 576 ms
576 msContentSquare costs a phone 576 ms of main-thread work and 168 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 88 KiB88 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 45 KiB45 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2,316 HTML elements
The page has 2,316 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 122 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
50 ms · 45 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (45 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 257 ms
257 msYour server sent the HTML in 257 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.2 s
7.2 sReal visitors wait 7.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.40
0.40For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.40 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 6.8 s
6.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 58.7 s
58.7 sYour largest element takes 58.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 30.4 s
30.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 30.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 76.3 s
76.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 76.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.2 s
5.2 sThe first text or image appears after 5.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.378
0.378The layout shifts by 0.378 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user INP: 295 ms
295 msReal visitors wait 295 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
30 images without width and height
30 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 359 ms
359 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 359 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 141 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 4.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 27.9 MB in 177 requests
27.9 MBYour homepage downloads 27.9 MB in 177 requests on a phone: images 24.1 MB (47), scripts 2.2 MB (49) and other files 665 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images over 500 KB
10 images weigh 20.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
15 images far larger than shown
15.5 MB15 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3265_0_cam_research.jpg at 4,592 px wide, shown at 310 px. Resized copies would save about 15.5 MB.
30 images in older formats
30 images (23.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
24 images below the first screen load straight away
24 images further down the page (15.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 7.9 g of CO₂ per visit
7.89 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.89 g of CO₂e: 947.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
22 buttons without a name
22 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (8 characters)
Your title is only 8 characters: “الرئيسية”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (13 characters)
Your meta description is only 13 characters: “جامعة قطر: QU”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.qu.edu.qa/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
208 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 208 pages on qu.edu.qa and 1 external page.
2 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/Pages/default.aspx.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.qu.edu.qa/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
14 pages share a meta description
https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/default.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/President-Message.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/mission-and-vision.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/Organization-Structure.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/leadership/Pages/default.aspx and https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/qu-timeline.aspx and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/Events.aspx, whose canonical is https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/Events/Pages/default.aspx. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/Events.aspx and https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/newsroom.aspx have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages with very little text
https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/default.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/President-Message.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/mission-and-vision.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/Organization-Structure.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/leadership/Pages/default.aspx and https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/qu-timeline.aspx and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 pages slow to respond
https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/default.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/President-Message.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/mission-and-vision.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/Organization-Structure.aspx, https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/leadership/Pages/default.aspx and https://www.qu.edu.qa/ar/about/Pages/qu-timeline.aspx and 4 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 176 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'toLowerCase')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
46 of 52 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 102 words
The homepage has only about 102 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at qu.edu.qa, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Employees
- 700
- Founded
- 1973
- Headquarters
- Doha
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 59 issues on qu.edu.qa, including 26 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.