Programmable

Website review, no card needed

quadcubes.com logo

quadcubes.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202618 issues · 74 checks

This review found 18 issues worth fixing on quadcubes.com, 4 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

90A

Closest competitors among reviewed websites

Compare side by side
Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
148 ms103 msMay 9Oct 24115 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026130 ms
May 16, 2026126 ms
May 23, 2026108 ms
May 30, 2026127 ms
Jun 6, 2026143 ms
Jun 13, 2026131 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026123 ms
Jul 4, 2026127 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026128 ms
Jul 25, 2026128 ms
Aug 1, 2026124 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026135 ms
Aug 22, 2026131 ms
Aug 29, 2026131 ms
Sep 5, 2026139 ms
Sep 12, 2026139 ms
Sep 19, 2026141 ms
Sep 26, 2026138 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026136 ms
Oct 17, 2026119 ms
Oct 24, 2026115 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

quadcubes.com (opens in a new tab)
Full-page screenshot of quadcubes.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. quadcubes.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. quadcubes.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. quadcubes.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. quadcubes.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. quadcubes.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. quadcubes.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. quadcubes.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. quadcubes.com at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

3 to fix99

  • Reduce initial server response time

    712 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 712 ms on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    700 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 700 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Server response: 812 ms

    812 ms

    Your server takes 812 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 57 KiB

    2 images could be 57 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    34 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (34 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed

  • Mobile performance score: 99

    99/100

    Your mobile performance score is 99. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 47 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix100

  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 802 ms

    802 ms

    Real visitors wait 802 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

10 checks passed

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 114 ms

    114 ms

    Real visitors wait 114 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.5 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.5 s.

Images and page weight

100

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (49 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.13 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.13 g of CO₂e: 15.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed

  • Page weight: 452 KiB in 12 requests

    452 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 452 KiB in 12 requests on a phone: fonts 223 KiB (3), HTML 115 KiB (1) and images 111 KiB (7). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9394

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed

  • Every image has alt text

    All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085

  • Title is long (75 characters)

    Your title is 75 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Digital Marketing Agency in Calicut, Kerala | Advertising Company in Kerala”.

  • Meta description is long (257 characters)

    Your meta description is 257 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 47 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on quadcubes.com and 20 external pages.

5 checks passed

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Best Digital Marketing Agency in Kerala,India”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://quadcubes.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ImageObject, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://quadcubes.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88

  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed

  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (392 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://quadcubes.com/llms.txt (150 KiB, 107 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://quadcubes.com/about-us, https://quadcubes.com/career, https://quadcubes.com/blog, https://quadcubes.com/contact-us and https://quadcubes.com/pepper-award-2025 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed

  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed

  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix81

  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 278 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 278 words of visible text.

6 checks passed

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Enquire now” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos, 1 trust badge and “0 + Businesses”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quadcubes.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Hostinger

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 18 issues on quadcubes.com, including 6 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25