Website review, no card needed

quintadolago.com logo

quintadolago.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202643 issues · 89 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on quintadolago.com, 18 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.1 s3.2 sMay 16Oct 313.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.7 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.7 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.9 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Oct 31, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
210 ms142 msMay 16Oct 31202 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026152 ms
May 23, 2026153 ms
May 30, 2026154 ms
Jun 6, 2026154 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jun 20, 2026150 ms
Jun 27, 2026152 ms
Jul 4, 2026153 ms
Jul 11, 2026155 ms
Jul 18, 2026159 ms
Jul 25, 2026159 ms
Aug 1, 2026161 ms
Aug 8, 2026163 ms
Aug 15, 2026166 ms
Aug 22, 2026172 ms
Aug 29, 2026175 ms
Sep 5, 2026177 ms
Sep 12, 2026179 ms
Sep 19, 2026180 ms
Sep 26, 2026187 ms
Oct 3, 2026192 ms
Oct 10, 2026195 ms
Oct 17, 2026202 ms
Oct 24, 2026202 ms
Oct 31, 2026202 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of quintadolago.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. quintadolago.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. quintadolago.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. quintadolago.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. quintadolago.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. quintadolago.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. quintadolago.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. quintadolago.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  8. quintadolago.com at 7.4 s7.4 s

Speed

13 to fix34
  • Improve image delivery

    11.4 s · 19.5 MB

    10 images could be 19.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.3 s · 844 KiB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (844 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.6 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 872 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudfront.net and hijiffy.com and others), adding 30.2 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.

  • cloudfront.net adds 560 ms

    560 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 560 ms of main-thread work and 28.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 919 KiB

    About 919 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 389 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • hijiffy.com adds 345 ms

    345 ms

    hijiffy.com costs a phone 345 ms of main-thread work and 437 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 60 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 60 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 302 ms

    302 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 302 ms of main-thread work and 255 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    220 ms · 73 KiB

    About 73 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 220 ms faster on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    104 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 217 ms

    217 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 217 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.7 s

    26.7 s

    Your largest element takes 26.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.7 s

    37.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors

    +32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 202 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 175 ms

    175 ms

    Real visitors wait 175 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 30.5 MB in 154 requests

    30.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 30.5 MB in 154 requests on a phone: images 27.8 MB (69), scripts 2.1 MB (35) and fonts 248 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 22.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 9 images far larger than shown

    18.7 MB

    9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 553ae2256f76773b47049e5fb4602f45.jpg at 5,067 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 18.7 MB.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (27.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (20.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 8.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.65 g of CO₂e: 1038.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8394
  • 4 buttons without a name

    4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 28 links without text

    28 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 54 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8583
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 117 internal links, 53 external

    The homepage links to 117 pages on quintadolago.com and 53 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Quinta do Lago Resort is an exclusive Golf Residential Resort walled by award winning golf courses, featuring Luxury Re…”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Quinta do Lago Resort - Luxury Golf & Real Estate, Algarve”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.quintadolago.com/en/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quintadolago.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.quintadolago.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,427 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.quintadolago.com/en/resort/destination and https://www.quintadolago.com/en/resort/lifestyle have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.quintadolago.com/en/properties/sale took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5065978&Ver=2&mid=a3cb7703-be38-4ccc-84d4-2778b06bf9f6&bo=1&sid=dca01130d88b11f198278536867559d8&vid=dca022e0d88b11f1b8c24369c4434b75&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    86 of 101 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 634 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 634 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Now” and “Shop”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Book Now”, “Shop” and “Start here”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 19 testimonial or review blocks, 25 customer or partner logos and 7 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quintadolago.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Hiring

Hiring
3 open roles
Job board
careers page

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on quintadolago.com, including 24 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25