Website review, no card needed
quintadolago.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202643 issues · 89 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on quintadolago.com, 18 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 202 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.9 s
2.8 s
3.7 s
4.6 s
5.6 s
6.5 s
7.4 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
11.4 s · 19.5 MB10 images could be 19.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.3 s · 844 KiB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (844 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 872 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.2 s
A phone's processor spends 5.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudfront.net and hijiffy.com and others), adding 30.2 MB and 2.6 s of main-thread time.
cloudfront.net adds 560 ms
560 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 560 ms of main-thread work and 28.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 919 KiBAbout 919 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
19 long tasks on the main thread
19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 389 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
hijiffy.com adds 345 ms
345 mshijiffy.com costs a phone 345 ms of main-thread work and 437 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 60 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 60 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 302 ms
302 msFacebook costs a phone 302 ms of main-thread work and 255 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
220 ms · 73 KiBAbout 73 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 220 ms faster on a phone.
Document request latency
104 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Minify JavaScript
15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 217 ms
217 msYour server sent the HTML in 217 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 26.7 s
26.7 sYour largest element takes 26.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 37.7 s
37.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 37.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.8 s
14.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors
+32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 202 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 175 ms
175 msReal visitors wait 175 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 30.5 MB in 154 requests
30.5 MBYour homepage downloads 30.5 MB in 154 requests on a phone: images 27.8 MB (69), scripts 2.1 MB (35) and fonts 248 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
8 images over 500 KB
8 images weigh 22.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
9 images far larger than shown
18.7 MB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 553ae2256f76773b47049e5fb4602f45.jpg at 5,067 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 18.7 MB.
40 images in older formats
40 images (27.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (20.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 8.7 g of CO₂ per visit
8.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.65 g of CO₂e: 1038.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
28 links without text
28 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 54 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
117 internal links, 53 external
The homepage links to 117 pages on quintadolago.com and 53 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Quinta do Lago Resort is an exclusive Golf Residential Resort walled by award winning golf courses, featuring Luxury Re…”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Quinta do Lago Resort - Luxury Golf & Real Estate, Algarve”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.quintadolago.com/en/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.quintadolago.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.quintadolago.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,427 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without an H1
https://www.quintadolago.com/en/resort/destination and https://www.quintadolago.com/en/resort/lifestyle have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.quintadolago.com/en/properties/sale took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5065978&Ver=2&mid=a3cb7703-be38-4ccc-84d4-2778b06bf9f6&bo=1&sid=dca01130d88b11f198278536867559d8&vid=dca022e0d88b11f1b8c24369c4434b75&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
86 of 101 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 634 words of copy
The homepage carries about 634 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Now” and “Shop”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Book Now”, “Shop” and “Start here”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 19 testimonial or review blocks, 25 customer or partner logos and 7 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quintadolago.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 3 open roles
- Job board
- careers page
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on quintadolago.com, including 24 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.