quincymedgroup.com website review

26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

About 673 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.6 s faster on a phone.

183 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

7 images could be 170 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.

4 third-party services load with your homepage (azurefd.net, Google Tag Manager and perfalytics.com and others), adding 1.7 MB and 824 ms of main-thread time.

About 130 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

azurefd.net costs a phone 692 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

Polyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 256 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 840 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 11.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

The page becomes fully interactive after 11.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 646 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 99 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 images further down the page (156 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.49 g of CO₂e: 59.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

Some list items are not inside a list.

Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

Structured data found (MedicalOrganization) but with 1 problem, for example “MedicalOrganization: url is not an absolute URL ("quincymedgroup.com")”.

The homepage links to 46 pages on quincymedgroup.com and 10 external pages.

Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

There is no https://www.quincymedgroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

https://www.quincymedgroup.com/schedule, https://www.quincymedgroup.com/services, https://www.quincymedgroup.com/locations, https://www.quincymedgroup.com/billing-finance, https://www.quincymedgroup.com/patient-experience and https://www.quincymedgroup.com/health-topics and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

https://www.quincymedgroup.com/schedule, https://www.quincymedgroup.com/physicians, https://www.quincymedgroup.com/services and https://www.quincymedgroup.com/events have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

https://www.quincymedgroup.com/schedule has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Executing inline script violates the following Content Security Policy directive 'script-src 'self' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsa…”.

Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 278 words of visible text.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.