Website review, no card needed

quotrell.com logo

quotrell.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202630 issues · 83 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on quotrell.com, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s1.7 sMay 16Oct 311.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
323 ms157 msMay 16Oct 31196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026178 ms
May 23, 2026177 ms
May 30, 2026176 ms
Jun 6, 2026182 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026179 ms
Jun 27, 2026187 ms
Jul 4, 2026192 ms
Jul 11, 2026251 ms
Jul 18, 2026295 ms
Jul 25, 2026298 ms
Aug 1, 2026297 ms
Aug 8, 2026296 ms
Aug 15, 2026294 ms
Aug 22, 2026303 ms
Aug 29, 2026304 ms
Sep 5, 2026301 ms
Sep 12, 2026296 ms
Sep 19, 2026272 ms
Sep 26, 2026258 ms
Oct 3, 2026235 ms
Oct 10, 2026221 ms
Oct 17, 2026216 ms
Oct 24, 2026210 ms
Oct 31, 2026196 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of quotrell.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. quotrell.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. quotrell.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. quotrell.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. quotrell.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. quotrell.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. quotrell.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. quotrell.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. quotrell.com at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

7 to fix51
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • 6,124 HTML elements

    The page has 6,124 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    850 ms · 677 KiB

    17 images could be 677 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 696 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 81 KiB

    About 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 786 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 67 KiB

    About 67 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 48 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (48 KiB).

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (visually-io.com, Shopify and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 304 KiB and 60 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Fall Winter '26”.

  • Speed Index: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 524 ms

    524 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 524 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 178 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 152 ms

    152 ms

    Real visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 413 ms

    413 ms

    Real visitors wait 413 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 37% faster for real visitors

    -37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 116 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 116 requests on a phone: images 2.0 MB (65), scripts 469 KiB (32) and fonts 247 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    IMG_9021.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (453 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8989
  • 12 buttons without a name

    12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 33 images without alt text

    33 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (12 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (12 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 6 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9284
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https:files/logo-quotrell_762097e6-1539-4d35-92af-7135c…”.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 580 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 580 pages on quotrell.com and 12 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “Quotrell®️ – Fashion that sets the standard, designed for comfort and style. Explore the latest collection and shop now…”.

  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Quotrell®️ Official Store – Men's & Women's Clothing”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://quotrell.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://quotrell.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,400 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 6 pages slow to respond

    /collections/giftcards, /collections/men-all-tops, /collections/men-longsleeve, /collections/men-knitwear, /collections/outerwear-men and /collections/hoodies-men took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 88 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 35 small tap targets

    35 of 82 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,022 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,022 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP MEN” and “SHOP WOMEN”.

  • 48 calls to action

    The homepage has 48 calls to action, for example “SHOP MEN”, “SHOP WOMEN” and “SHOP ALL SHOP ALL (56)”.

  • 60 short forms

    60 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating, 1 trust badge and “150k+ Happy Customers”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at quotrell.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Triplewhale · T Lab Ai Translate · Microsoft Clarity · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Content Translation · snapchat.com · trustpilot.com · wetracked.io · amazonaws.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on quotrell.com, including 13 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25