Website review, no card needed
rad-global.com.au website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202625 issues · 74 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on rad-global.com.au, 6 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: orphan list items. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
88B- #5,228 of 108,880 reviewed websitesbeats 93%
- #2,908 of 61,767 online storesbeats 93%
- #2,825 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 92%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 854 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 865 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 924 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 956 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 989 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 942 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 907 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 843 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 817 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 834 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 833 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 883 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 900 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 915 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 986 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 996 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 978 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 984 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 74 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 73 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 76 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 73 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 75 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 97 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.1 s
3.7 s
4.3 s
4.9 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 76
76/100Your mobile performance score is 76. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
Klaviyo adds 263 ms
263 msKlaviyo costs a phone 263 ms of main-thread work and 379 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 973 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, Shopify and northbeam.io and others), adding 601 KiB and 385 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 105 KiBAbout 105 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 53 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (53 KiB).
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 21 KiB1 image could be 21 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sYour largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 11.8 s
11.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors
+32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 74 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 84 ms
84 msReal visitors wait 84 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 2.7 s
2.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.7 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 75 ms
75 msScripts block the page for only 75 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.039
0.039The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.039, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.1 MB in 260 requests
3.1 MBYour homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 260 requests on a phone: other files 845 KiB (103), media 730 KiB (1) and scripts 645 KiB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 104.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
19 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 19 pages on rad-global.com.au and 11 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “A brand that transcends training, we occupy the space between functional fitness and action sports. Designed in Portlan…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “R.A.D® AU”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “R.A.D® AU – Performance products Tuned For The Future”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://rad-global.com.au/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rad-global.com.au/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://rad-global.com.au/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://rad-global.com.au/collections/all-products, https://rad-global.com.au/pages/ethos, https://rad-global.com.au/policies/privacy-policy, https://rad-global.com.au/policies/refund-policy and https://rad-global.com.au/policies/shipping-policy have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://rad-global.com.au/pages/ethos has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 internal pages checked
We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 5 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
18 small tap targets
18 of 34 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 148 words
The homepage has only about 148 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP” and “SIGN UP”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “SHOP”, “Shop the US store” and “Shop the UK store”.
1 short form
A short form (0 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rad-global.com.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 2 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Consentmo Gdpr · Gdpr Backpack
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on rad-global.com.au, including 7 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.