Website review, no card needed

radiant.digital logo

radiant.digital website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202642 issues · 85 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on radiant.digital, 13 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of radiant.digital (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. radiant.digital at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. radiant.digital at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. radiant.digital at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. radiant.digital at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. radiant.digital at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. radiant.digital at 4.1 s4.1 s
  7. radiant.digital at 4.8 s4.8 s
  8. radiant.digital at 5.5 s5.5 s

Speed

10 to fix53
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 4.2 MB

    11 images could be 4.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    990 ms · 182 KiB

    About 182 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 990 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    500 ms · 100 KiB

    About 100 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome CDN and Clarity and others), adding 1.2 MB and 386 ms of main-thread time.

  • Main-thread work: 2.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,206 HTML elements

    The page has 2,206 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 180 ms

    180 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 180 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • FontAwesome CDN adds 73 ms

    73 ms

    FontAwesome CDN costs a phone 73 ms of main-thread work and 492 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Document request latency

    244 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 178 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 193 ms

    193 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 193 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix61
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.8 s

    17.8 s

    Your largest element takes 17.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner 1”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.8 s

    21.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.107

    0.107

    The layout shifts by 0.107 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 128 ms

    128 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 128 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.7 MB in 86 requests

    6.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.7 MB in 86 requests on a phone: images 5.0 MB (44), scripts 1,007 KiB (15) and HTML 365 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    ai-banner-6-scaled-uai-1440x657.png.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    48 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example shutterstock_456200890-scaled-1-1-uai-1440x961_0.webp at 1,440 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 48 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (384 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (226 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.91 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.91 g of CO₂e: 229.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8288
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 6969
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “Homepage | Radiant”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Advancing Industrial IoT with AI-Accelerated Prod…”, “Scaling Telecom Service Capacity 5x with Intellig…” and “Enabling Network Intelligence in Telecom through …”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 26 links with vague text

    26 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 251 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 251 pages on radiant.digital and 6 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://radiant.digital/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://radiant.digital/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://radiant.digital/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,846 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://radiant.digital/what-we-do and https://radiant.digital/who-we-are have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://radiant.digital/what-we-do has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://radiant.digital/service/digital-strategy-and-experience, https://radiant.digital/solution/sales-accelerator, https://radiant.digital/markets-international-americas and https://radiant.digital/market/markets-international-apac took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 103 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 79 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,669 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,669 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Join Us Now” and “Subscribe”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at radiant.digital, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Liquid Web

Hiring

Hiring
34 open roles
Teams
Product (12), Engineering (6), Infrastructure Operations (5), Finance (3)
Job board
ashby

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on radiant.digital, including 16 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25