Website review, no card needed
radianttech.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202641 issues · 83 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on radianttech.net, 13 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.5 s
5.1 s
7.6 s
10.1 s
12.6 s
15.2 s
17.7 s
20.2 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10.7 s · 4.1 MB97 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.1 MB).
Improve image delivery
8.4 s · 2.0 MB4 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.0 s30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.
Font display
3.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).
Reduce unused CSS
900 ms · 196 KiBAbout 196 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 608 KiBAbout 608 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Google Maps and others), adding 1.2 MB and 634 ms of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 296 ms
296 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 296 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.6 s
A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,526 HTML elements
The page has 1,526 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 135 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
32 KiB32 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
28 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 39 ms
39 msYour server sent the HTML in 39 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.9 s
14.9 sYour largest element takes 14.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We’re Radiant Technology Group, Inc. where innovation meets…”. Most of its time is element render delay (9.7 s).
Speed Index: 18.9 s
18.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 33.3 s
33.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 155 ms
155 msScripts block the page for only 155 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.077
0.077The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.077, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.3 MB in 145 requests
7.3 MBYour homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 145 requests on a phone: images 3.4 MB (17), scripts 1.5 MB (65) and other files 1.5 MB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images in older formats
4 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
75 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 1.jpeg at 600 px wide, shown at 44 px. Resized copies would save about 75 KiB.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.06 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.06 g of CO₂e: 247.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
25 links without text
25 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h4 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “Home - Radiant Technology”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (202 characters)
Your meta description is 202 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
99 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 99 pages on radianttech.net and 11 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://radianttech.net/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://radianttech.net/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://radianttech.net/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,219 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://radianttech.net/blog, https://radianttech.net/blog/category/news and https://radianttech.net/blog/category/videos have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://radianttech.net/collaboration, https://radianttech.net/digital-signage, https://radianttech.net/services, https://radianttech.net/smart-airports, https://radianttech.net/integrated-operations-centers and https://radianttech.net/manufacturing and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 pages slow to respond
https://radianttech.net/digital-signage, https://radianttech.net/services, https://radianttech.net/smart-airports, https://radianttech.net/integrated-operations-centers, https://radianttech.net/manufacturing and https://radianttech.net/medical-solutions and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (4 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
About 724 words of copy
The homepage carries about 724 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start your digital journey”.
16 calls to action
The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Talk to an Expert” and “Schedule a Tour”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at radianttech.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on radianttech.net, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.