Website review, no card needed
radiofarda.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202644 issues · 82 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on radiofarda.com, 18 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 12.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 14.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 15.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 15.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 15.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 15.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 15.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 15.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 14.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 13.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 13.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 13.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 13.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 11.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 9.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 119 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 225 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.0 s · 558 KiBAbout 558 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 568 KiB26 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (568 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 52). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 785 ms
785 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 785 ms of main-thread work and 700 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 47 KiBAbout 47 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Main-thread work: 2.4 s
A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
20 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 8.1 s
8.1 sReal visitors wait 8.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 6.8 s
6.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors wait 4.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s
11.8 sYour largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 14.9 s
14.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 718 ms
718 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 718 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 205 ms
205 msReal visitors wait 205 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 90% slower for real visitors
+90%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 119 ms to 225 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 554% slower for real visitors
+554%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 7.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 4.6 s
4.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.46 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.46 g of CO₂e: 55.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.6 MB in 75 requests
1.6 MBYour homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 75 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (32), fonts 221 KiB (5) and images 62 KiB (16). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (109 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 109 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (10 characters)
Your title is only 10 characters: “رادیو فردا”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (284 characters)
Your meta description is 284 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
175 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 175 pages on radiofarda.com and 16 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.radiofarda.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.radiofarda.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.radiofarda.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.radiofarda.com/p/2831.html declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.radiofarda.com/p/2831.html all use the title “رادیو فردا”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.radiofarda.com/radio/digitalaudio has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.radiofarda.com/p/2831.html has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 pages with very little text
https://www.radiofarda.com/p/2831.html, https://www.radiofarda.com/Iran-politics, https://www.radiofarda.com/Iran-society, https://www.radiofarda.com/iran-culture-and-art, https://www.radiofarda.com/iran-economy and https://www.radiofarda.com/iran-us and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.radiofarda.com/.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.
4 low-resolution images
4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
72 of 73 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 2 words
The homepage has only about 2 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Comscore, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at radiofarda.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on radiofarda.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.