Website review, no card needed

rami.com logo

rami.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202638 issues · 86 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on rami.com, 14 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.6 s4.3 sMay 2Oct 174.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20265.1 s
May 9, 20265.2 s
May 16, 20265.0 s
May 23, 20264.9 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20265.0 s
Jun 13, 20265.1 s
Jun 20, 20265.2 s
Jun 27, 20265.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.7 s
Jul 11, 20264.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.7 s
Jul 25, 20264.8 s
Aug 1, 20264.8 s
Aug 8, 20264.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.8 s
Aug 22, 20265.0 s
Aug 29, 20265.4 s
Sep 5, 20265.4 s
Sep 12, 20265.4 s
Sep 19, 20265.2 s
Sep 26, 20264.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.7 s
Oct 10, 20264.6 s
Oct 17, 20264.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
195 ms110 msMay 2Oct 17120 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026129 ms
May 9, 2026121 ms
May 16, 2026121 ms
May 23, 2026122 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026135 ms
Jun 13, 2026142 ms
Jun 20, 2026143 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026148 ms
Jul 11, 2026166 ms
Jul 18, 2026167 ms
Jul 25, 2026185 ms
Aug 1, 2026162 ms
Aug 8, 2026146 ms
Aug 15, 2026143 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026146 ms
Sep 5, 2026145 ms
Sep 12, 2026132 ms
Sep 19, 2026127 ms
Sep 26, 2026120 ms
Oct 3, 2026123 ms
Oct 10, 2026124 ms
Oct 17, 2026120 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rami.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rami.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. rami.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. rami.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. rami.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. rami.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. rami.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. rami.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. rami.com at 3.9 s3.9 s

Speed

9 to fix52
  • Render-blocking requests

    5.3 s

    158 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.7 s · 927 KiB

    About 927 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 62). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and Google Analytics and others), adding 1.8 MB and 787 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 397 ms

    397 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 397 ms of main-thread work and 772 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 171 KiB

    About 171 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 359 ms

    359 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 359 ms of main-thread work and 959 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 26 KiB

    26 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 119 KiB

    5 images could be 119 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 186 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 17 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (17 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 6 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 6 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Real visitors wait 5.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.3 s

    11.3 s

    Your largest element takes 11.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “RAMI is a world class supplier of advanced antenna systems …”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 262 ms

    262 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 262 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.1 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 205 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 205 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (86), images 687 KiB (13) and stylesheets 280 KiB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    rami_home_truck-1500x430.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (641 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    180 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example rami_home_truck-1500x430.jpg at 1,500 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 180 KiB.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 104.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8390
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10097
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 48 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 48 pages on rami.com and 4 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 127 characters

    Your meta description is 127 characters: “World class supplier of advanced antenna systems and accessories to military, aviation, and transportation customers wo…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “RAMI – The Antenna Professionals”.

  • Title: 49 characters

    Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “RAMI: Loud and Clear - Antenna Manufacturer - USA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rami.com/antenna-professionals/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rami.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rami.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (881 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://www.rami.com/product-category/military/accessories-military/diplexer-triplexer-filter-accessories-military, https://www.rami.com/product-category/military/accessories-military/mast-kit, https://www.rami.com/product-category/military/accessories-military/mounts-and-adapters and https://www.rami.com/shadow-line have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://www.rami.com/all-products, https://www.rami.com/aviation-antennas, https://www.rami.com/purchase-products, https://www.rami.com/design, https://www.rami.com/testing and https://www.rami.com/manufacturing-capabilities and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://www.rami.com/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure favicon 'http://ram…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 325 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 325 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Request a Quote” and “Contact Us”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rami.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on rami.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25