Website review, no card needed

ramirent.se logo

ramirent.se website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202630 issues · 80 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on ramirent.se, 8 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.7 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
151 ms126 msMay 9Oct 24148 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026129 ms
May 16, 2026130 ms
May 23, 2026135 ms
May 30, 2026138 ms
Jun 6, 2026140 ms
Jun 13, 2026140 ms
Jun 20, 2026140 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026138 ms
Jul 18, 2026138 ms
Jul 25, 2026138 ms
Aug 1, 2026139 ms
Aug 8, 2026139 ms
Aug 15, 2026141 ms
Aug 22, 2026140 ms
Aug 29, 2026141 ms
Sep 5, 2026141 ms
Sep 12, 2026138 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026140 ms
Oct 10, 2026144 ms
Oct 17, 2026145 ms
Oct 24, 2026148 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ramirent.se (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ramirent.se at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. ramirent.se at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. ramirent.se at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. ramirent.se at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. ramirent.se at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. ramirent.se at 4.4 s4.4 s
  7. ramirent.se at 5.2 s5.2 s
  8. ramirent.se at 5.9 s5.9 s

Speed

7 to fix51
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.0 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 4.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 288 ms

    288 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 288 ms of main-thread work and 354 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,105 HTML elements

    The page has 2,105 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • sanity.io adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    sanity.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and InZynk and others), adding 862 KiB and 364 ms of main-thread time.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    98 KiB

    6 images could be 98 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    55 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (55 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    27 KiB

    About 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 392 ms

    392 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 392 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.35

    0.35

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.35 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.5 s

    15.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Your largest element takes 6.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Smidig service över hela Sverige när du vill hyra saxlift, …”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.19

    0.19

    The layout shifts by 0.19 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 357 ms

    357 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 357 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 148 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 178 ms

    178 ms

    Real visitors wait 178 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 454 ms

    454 ms

    Real visitors wait 454 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix69
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 69 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 69 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (29), images 456 KiB (18) and fonts 245 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    71855c9f610d09a1152e5d62f1fa7fd83922e93f-6000x4000.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    32 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 202d3cc0e9fa6a66189421128b66794dd8ea4e57-5777x3851.jpg at 1,200 px wide, shown at 342 px. Resized copies would save about 32 KiB.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8695
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10089
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 30 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 30 pages on ramirent.se and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Hyr liftar, byggmaskiner, bodar, ställningar och anläggningsmaskiner i hela Sverige. Snabb leverans, expertrådgivning o…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Hyr liftar, byggmaskiner, bodar, ställning och anläggningsmaskiner”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Hyr liftar, bodar & byggmaskiner i hela Sverige | Ramirent”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ramirent.se/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.ramirent.se/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (454 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.ramirent.se/utbildning has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.ramirent.se/utbildning has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.ramirent.se/hyra/anlaggningsmaskiner and https://www.ramirent.se/hyra/bodar-vagnar have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to fetch at 'https://utbildning.ramirent.se/api/user/status' from origin 'https://www.ramirent.se' has been bloc…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    16 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 454 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 454 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Call us on +4610-152 0206”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ramirent.se, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on ramirent.se, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25