Website review, no card needed

rappi.com.br logo

rappi.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202645 issues · 82 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on rappi.com.br, 20 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 34. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 172.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.6 s
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
269 ms219 msMay 2Oct 17263 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026254 ms
May 9, 2026254 ms
May 16, 2026254 ms
May 23, 2026245 ms
May 30, 2026238 ms
Jun 6, 2026231 ms
Jun 13, 2026226 ms
Jun 20, 2026226 ms
Jun 27, 2026229 ms
Jul 4, 2026229 ms
Jul 11, 2026228 ms
Jul 18, 2026227 ms
Jul 25, 2026225 ms
Aug 1, 2026225 ms
Aug 8, 2026228 ms
Aug 15, 2026235 ms
Aug 22, 2026239 ms
Aug 29, 2026242 ms
Sep 5, 2026243 ms
Sep 12, 2026243 ms
Sep 19, 2026244 ms
Sep 26, 2026249 ms
Oct 3, 2026253 ms
Oct 10, 2026259 ms
Oct 17, 2026263 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rappi.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rappi.com.br at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rappi.com.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rappi.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. rappi.com.br at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. rappi.com.br at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. rappi.com.br at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. rappi.com.br at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. rappi.com.br at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix34
  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 53). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 711 ms

    711 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 711 ms of main-thread work and 911 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    630 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (630 KiB).

  • Facebook adds 278 ms

    278 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 278 ms of main-thread work and 401 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    281 KiB

    2 images could be 281 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 84 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 84 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 215 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.7 s

    37.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Se você tem Rappi, você tem tudo.”.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 249 ms

    249 ms

    Real visitors wait 249 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.14

    0.14

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.14 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.235

    0.235

    The layout shifts by 0.235 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 254 ms to 263 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

3 to fix35
  • Page weight: 6.3 MB in 166 requests

    6.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.3 MB in 166 requests on a phone: scripts 3.5 MB (61), images 1.5 MB (9) and other files 1.2 MB (90). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    turbo_r8_offer.png weighs 955 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    1.3 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example turbo_r8_offer.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.

  • About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.80 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.80 g of CO₂e: 215.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8790
  • 16 text elements with low contrast

    16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 4 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9284
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (ItemList, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “ItemList: itemListElement is an empty list”.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 46 internal links, 35 external

    The homepage links to 46 pages on rappi.com.br and 35 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “Delivery de restaurantes, supermercados, farmácia e muito mais! Suas lojas preferidas estão na Rappi. Entregamos com am…”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Delivery de Comida e Mercado na sua Casa - Rappi Brasil”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rappi.com.br/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rappi.com.br/sitemaps/country/br/restaurant-partners.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rappi.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (404 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix70
  • 3 pages without a title

    https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/22793-ponto-da-esfiha, https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/3369-ofner and https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/169343-outback-steakhouse have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/22793-ponto-da-esfiha, https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/3369-ofner and https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/169343-outback-steakhouse have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/1031-burger-king, whose canonical is https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/22793-ponto-da-esfiha, https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/3369-ofner and https://www.rappi.com.br/restaurantes/delivery/169343-outback-steakhouse have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=112162293&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=e09e8aa2-6c6f-4656-91d1-0165cd337019&bo=1&sid=8ba573a0d06d11f1b4d4475ceb3d5304&vid=8ba5f500d06d11f1aa4e67a8a44f6aa9&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    38 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix43
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 219 words

    The homepage has only about 219 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Amplitude.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 33 cookies set on arrival

    33

    Opening the homepage sets 33 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rappi.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Amplitude | LogRocket

Company

Employees
4,000
Founded
2015
Headquarters
Bogotá

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on rappi.com.br, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25