Website review, no card needed

rech.com logo

rech.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202631 issues · 76 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on rech.com, 11 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
112 ms78 msMay 9Oct 2496 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202693 ms
May 16, 2026103 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202693 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026106 ms
Jun 27, 2026108 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202690 ms
Jul 25, 202682 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202691 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202695 ms
Sep 12, 2026106 ms
Sep 19, 2026103 ms
Sep 26, 202699 ms
Oct 3, 202699 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rech.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rech.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rech.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rech.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. rech.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. rech.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. rech.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. rech.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. rech.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

5 to fix59
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Document request latency

    900 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 900 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    896 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 896 ms on a phone.

  • Server response: 996 ms

    996 ms

    Your server takes 996 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 88 KiB

    81 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (88 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 46 KiB

    About 46 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (jQuery CDN and Google Fonts), adding 33 KiB and 47 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    42 KiB

    About 42 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    27 KiB

    2 images could be 27 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 408 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.51

    0.51

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.51 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.455

    0.455

    The layout shifts by 0.455 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.29 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.29 g of CO₂e: 35.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.0 MB in 89 requests

    1.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.0 MB in 89 requests on a phone: images 538 KiB (18), scripts 266 KiB (30) and fonts 116 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9297
  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Horizontina”, “Itajaí” and “Navegantes”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 56 internal links, 30 external

    The homepage links to 56 pages on rech.com and 30 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Rech - Peças para máquinas pesadas e agrícolas”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://rech.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rech.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (338 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (2 KiB, 7 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix58
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to /novo/lojas, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 5 pages share a title

    /nossa-historia, /noticias, /relacao-com-investidores, /governanca and /politica-de-privacidade all use the title “Rech”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    /nossa-historia, /lojas, /produtos, /noticias, /filtro/linha-agricola and /filtro/linha-amarela and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /nossa-historia and /filtro/motores have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /filtro/motores took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 13 internal pages checked

    We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

7 to fix38
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 300 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 300 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
React
Hosting
Hostinger

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on rech.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 7 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25