Website review, no card needed
reckon.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202641 issues · 92 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on reckon.com, 14 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 47. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 349 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 315 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 295 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 299 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 230 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,131 HTML elements
The page has 3,131 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Wistia, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 962 KiBAbout 962 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Wistia adds 679 ms
679 msWistia costs a phone 679 ms of main-thread work and 525 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 109 KiBAbout 109 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 370 ms
370 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 370 ms of main-thread work and 533 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
366 KiB13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (366 KiB).
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
96 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 96 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
84 KiB2 images could be 84 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
13 KiB13 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 28 ms
28 msYour server sent the HTML in 28 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 20.0 s
20.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sYour largest element takes 5.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Accounting and payroll made for every small business”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.383
0.383The layout shifts by 0.383 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 6.8 s
6.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 223 ms
223 msReal visitors wait 223 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 274 ms
274 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 274 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 30% faster for real visitors
-30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 349 ms to 230 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 29% faster for real visitors
-29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.0 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 176 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 176 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (96), fonts 405 KiB (14) and images 315 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (92 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (92 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.91 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.91 g of CO₂e: 109.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (109 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 109 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
169 internal links, 33 external
The homepage links to 169 pages on reckon.com and 33 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Australian accounting and payroll software that's made for small business, accountants, & bookkeepers. Reckon is truste…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Accounting and payroll made for everysmall business”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Accounting, Business & Bookkeeping Software | Reckon AU”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.reckon.com/au/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, ItemList, Organization and SoftwareApplication.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.reckon.com/au/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,850 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (21 KiB, 130 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/au/switch-to-reckon has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page slow to respond
/au/support took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=211010824&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=abc107fe-a0c4-4bf9-9eae-6e4c6798c076&bo=1&sid=f05cb530d32611f1b5f89ddd730058f7&vid=f05ced60d32611f1abad27c359f6b454&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ttd_dom_ready is not defined”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
14 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 920 words of copy
The homepage carries about 920 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “GET STARTED”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Join now for live and on-demand webinars”, “Contact Us” and “Plans & Pricing”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
33 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at reckon.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Founded
- 1987
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on reckon.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.