Website review, no card needed

recordnet.com logo

recordnet.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202637 issues · 90 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on recordnet.com, 14 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: integral Ad Science adds 1.5 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 171.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
205 ms143 msMay 2Oct 17171 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026150 ms
May 9, 2026164 ms
May 16, 2026165 ms
May 23, 2026167 ms
May 30, 2026169 ms
Jun 6, 2026165 ms
Jun 13, 2026157 ms
Jun 20, 2026165 ms
Jun 27, 2026176 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026198 ms
Jul 18, 2026188 ms
Jul 25, 2026188 ms
Aug 1, 2026181 ms
Aug 8, 2026183 ms
Aug 15, 2026187 ms
Aug 22, 2026182 ms
Aug 29, 2026170 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026150 ms
Sep 19, 2026152 ms
Sep 26, 2026162 ms
Oct 3, 2026171 ms
Oct 10, 2026169 ms
Oct 17, 2026171 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of recordnet.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. recordnet.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. recordnet.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. recordnet.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. recordnet.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  5. recordnet.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  6. recordnet.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  7. recordnet.com at 7.1 s7.1 s
  8. recordnet.com at 8.1 s8.1 s

Speed

10 to fix34
  • Integral Ad Science adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Integral Ad Science costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 232 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 6.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Integral Ad Science, Taboola and confiant-integrations.net and others), adding 2.3 MB and 3.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 565 KiB

    147 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (565 KiB).

  • Taboola adds 906 ms

    906 ms

    Taboola costs a phone 906 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 591 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 515 ms

    515 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 515 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • confiant-integrations.net adds 537 ms

    537 ms

    confiant-integrations.net costs a phone 537 ms of main-thread work and 218 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    91 KiB

    91 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    59 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 59 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Improve image delivery

    37 KiB

    2 images could be 37 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    36 KiB

    About 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 16.0 s

    16.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 50.0 s

    50.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 50.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 150 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 150 ms

    150 ms

    Real visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 470 ms

    470 ms

    Real visitors wait 470 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.1 MB in 1,250 requests

    4.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 1,250 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (89), images 566 KiB (382) and other files 470 KiB (525). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.18 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.18 g of CO₂e: 141.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8293
  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (6 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 43 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 3 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8587
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 7 links crawlers can't follow

    7 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 66 internal links, 47 external

    The homepage links to 66 pages on recordnet.com and 47 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 104 characters

    Your meta description is 104 characters: “Get the latest breaking news, sports, entertainment and obituaries in Stockton, CA from Stockton Record.”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Stockton Record: Local News, Politics & Sports in Stockton, CA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.recordnet.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.recordnet.com/news-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers

    6 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.recordnet.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (561 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix65
  • 5 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.recordnet.com/story/news/courts/2026/10/23/jury-deliberating-wesley-brownlee-stockton-serial-killings-competency-trial/92400552007, https://www.recordnet.com/story/sports/high-school/football/2026/10/23/nfl-family-legacy-inspires-edison-footballs-donald-kennard-iii/92322444007, https://www.recordnet.com/story/news/accident/2026/10/23/gofundme-stockton-crash-victim-taliah-mechae-dupree/92387775007, https://www.recordnet.com/story/lifestyle/food/2026/10/20/stockton-food-plaza-joins-trend-of-grouping-food-trucks-in-central-location/92351815007 and https://www.recordnet.com/story/grocery/2026/09/29/san-joaquin-county-free-food-distributions-in-october-2026/91990812007, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.recordnet.com/obituaries and https://www.recordnet.com/public-notices have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.recordnet.com/enewspaper has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.recordnet.com/real-estate and https://www.recordnet.com/public-notices have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5485
  • 42 third-party cookies

    42 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 780 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 780 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Submit to sign up for newsletter” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 21 cookies set on arrival

    21

    Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 72 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 72 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at recordnet.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Company

Founded
1895

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on recordnet.com, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25