Website review, no card needed
redchilli.co.il website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202643 issues · 85 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on redchilli.co.il, 18 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #76,739 of 108,938 reviewed websitesbeats 26%
- #48,398 of 61,775 online storesbeats 18%
- #1,373 of 2,515 WooCommerce storesbeats 39%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 112 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.3 s · 2.2 MB20 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s62 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.2 s · 377 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (377 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 393 KiBAbout 393 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and glassix.com and others), adding 1.0 MB and 823 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 460 ms
460 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 460 ms of main-thread work and 506 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 224 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 37 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 30 KiBAbout 30 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.6 s
23.6 sYour largest element takes 23.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “אורך עדן1”.
Time to Interactive: 23.8 s
23.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.8 s
9.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 522 ms
522 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 522 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 77 ms
77 msReal visitors wait 77 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.1 MB in 176 requests
4.1 MBYour homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 176 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (29), scripts 1.2 MB (61) and fonts 148 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
אורך-עדן1.png weighs 1.3 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
13 images in older formats
13 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images far larger than shown
159 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Asset-6.png at 554 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 159 KiB.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (354 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.17 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.17 g of CO₂e: 140.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Positive tabindex
1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (5 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 29 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
98 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 98 pages on redchilli.co.il and 4 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “רד צ'ילי היא חברה חדשנית דינמית המחזיקה בזיכיונות של מותגי הילדים המובילים בישראל ובעולם, מתמחה בייצור ושיווק מוצרי טקס…”.
Title: 37 characters
Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “דף הבית | Red Chilli - מותגים שאוהבים”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://redchilli.co.il/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://redchilli.co.il/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://redchilli.co.il/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
6 pages share 3 titles
https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/bed-linen and https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/%d7%91%d7%93%d7%99%d7%93%d7%99%d7%9d/%d7%a1%d7%93%d7%99%d7%a0%d7%99%d7%9d-%d7%91%d7%93%d7%99%d7%93%d7%99%d7%9d all use the title “קולקציית סדינים | Red Chilli - מותגים שאוהבים”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom, https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/cotton, https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey, https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/bed-linen, https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%95%d7%aa-%d7%9e%d7%a6%d7%a2%d7%99-%d7%92%d7%a8%d7%a1%d7%99 and https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%99%d7%95%d7%aa and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 9 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%95%d7%aa-%d7%9e%d7%a6%d7%a2%d7%99-%d7%92%d7%a8%d7%a1%d7%99, whose canonical is https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%AA-%D7%9E%D7%A6%D7%A2%D7%99-%D7%92%D7%A8%D7%A1%D7%99. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages with very little text
https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%95%d7%aa-%d7%9e%d7%a6%d7%a2%d7%99-%d7%92%d7%a8%d7%a1%d7%99 and https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom-kids/%d7%9e%d7%a6%d7%a2%d7%99-%d7%9e%d7%a2%d7%91%d7%a8-100-%d7%9b%d7%95%d7%aa%d7%a0%d7%94 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
5 pages slow to respond
https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey, https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%95%d7%aa-%d7%9e%d7%a6%d7%a2%d7%99-%d7%92%d7%a8%d7%a1%d7%99, https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/jersey/%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%a4%d7%99%d7%95%d7%aa, https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom/%d7%91%d7%93%d7%99%d7%93%d7%99%d7%9d and https://redchilli.co.il/product-category/bedroom-kids/%d7%9e%d7%a6%d7%a2%d7%99-%d7%9e%d7%a2%d7%91%d7%a8-100-%d7%9b%d7%95%d7%aa%d7%a0%d7%94 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 40 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 400 (Bad Request)”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
87 of 88 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 25 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 32 words
The homepage has only about 32 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “SHOP NOW”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
25 cookies set on arrival
25Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at redchilli.co.il, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on redchilli.co.il, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.