Website review, no card needed
reclinersindia.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202646 issues · 99 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on reclinersindia.com, 27 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68D- #95,988 of 108,951 reviewed websitesbeats 10%
- #57,609 of 61,775 online storesbeats 5%
- #2,117 of 2,515 WooCommerce storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 7.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 7.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 7.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 8.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 7.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 7.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 6.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 193 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 211 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.5 s
5.0 s
7.5 s
9.9 s
12.4 s
14.9 s
17.4 s
19.9 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
18.7 s · 4.6 MBAbout 4.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 18.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.8 s · 962 KiB226 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (962 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
4.0 s67 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.
Improve image delivery
1.3 s · 1.6 MB60 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 2.4 s
2.4 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 2.4 s of main-thread work and 3.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 20.4 s
A phone's processor spends 20.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 11.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
1.2 s · 261 KiBAbout 261 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 11
11/100Your mobile performance score is 11 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,481 HTML elements
The page has 3,481 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, exei.ai and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 5.8 MB and 4.4 s of main-thread time.
exei.ai adds 798 ms
798 msexei.ai costs a phone 798 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 443 ms
443 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 443 ms of main-thread work and 343 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 451 ms
451 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 451 ms of main-thread work and 133 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 383 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Clarity adds 325 ms
325 msClarity costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 34 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
32 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 42 but mobile only 11. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 63.7 s
63.7 sYour largest element takes 63.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “best recliner manufacturer in Delhi (NCR), recliner sofa, r…”.
Speed Index: 36.1 s
36.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 36.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 65.2 s
65.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 65.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.9 s
2.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sThe first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.323
0.323The layout shifts by 0.323 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 173 ms
173 msReal visitors wait 173 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 46% faster for real visitors
-46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 7.0 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.6 MB in 418 requests
13.6 MBYour homepage downloads 13.6 MB in 418 requests on a phone: scripts 5.4 MB (129), images 4.8 MB (90) and other files 1.7 MB (77). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 2.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images in older formats
4 images (2.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.9 g of CO₂ per visit
3.87 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.87 g of CO₂e: 464.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
32 text elements with low contrast
32 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (4 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 form fields without a label
9 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
autocomplete attributes are not used correctly
autocomplete attributes are not used correctly (2 elements).
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (97 characters)
Your title is 97 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Best Recliner Manufacturer in India | Luxury Recliner Chair, Sofa | Motion Furniture Manu…”.
Meta description is long (371 characters)
Your meta description is 371 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
262 internal links, 53 external
The homepage links to 262 pages on reclinersindia.com and 53 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Best Recliner Manufacturer in India”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.reclinersindia.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, FurnitureStore, ImageObject, LocalBusiness and Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.reclinersindia.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.reclinersindia.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,638 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.reclinersindia.com/cart-3 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.reclinersindia.com/wishlist and https://www.reclinersindia.com/cart-3 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
10 pages without an H1
https://www.reclinersindia.com/wishlist, https://www.reclinersindia.com/cart-3, https://www.reclinersindia.com/product-category/cinema-seats-sliders, https://www.reclinersindia.com/product-category/cinema-recliner-home-theater-recliners, https://www.reclinersindia.com/product-category/recliner-smart-bed and https://www.reclinersindia.com/product-category/work-from-home-recliners and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.reclinersindia.com/wishlist and https://www.reclinersindia.com/cart-3 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 95 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “pintrk is not defined”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
57 of 68 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 1,328 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,328 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
9 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Shop” and “Call 1800 121 189 189”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 10 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 0 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
20 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at reclinersindia.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on reclinersindia.com, including 26 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.