Website review, no card needed

redefinemeat.com logo

redefinemeat.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202620 issues · 72 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on redefinemeat.com, 3 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: no call to action on the first screen. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s635 msMay 16Oct 31980 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 2026982 ms
Oct 24, 2026959 ms
Oct 31, 2026980 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
181 ms101 msMay 16Oct 31112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026152 ms
May 23, 2026158 ms
May 30, 2026161 ms
Jun 6, 2026160 ms
Jun 13, 2026158 ms
Jun 20, 2026154 ms
Jun 27, 2026151 ms
Jul 4, 2026154 ms
Jul 11, 2026154 ms
Jul 18, 2026157 ms
Jul 25, 2026154 ms
Aug 1, 2026157 ms
Aug 8, 2026160 ms
Aug 15, 2026161 ms
Aug 22, 2026170 ms
Aug 29, 2026171 ms
Sep 5, 2026172 ms
Sep 12, 2026170 ms
Sep 19, 2026170 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms
Oct 10, 2026127 ms
Oct 17, 2026114 ms
Oct 24, 2026110 ms
Oct 31, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of redefinemeat.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. redefinemeat.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. redefinemeat.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. redefinemeat.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. redefinemeat.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. redefinemeat.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. redefinemeat.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. redefinemeat.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. redefinemeat.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix85
  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 690 KiB

    9 images could be 690 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 85

    85/100

    Your mobile performance score is 85. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 35 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    350 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Cookiebot), adding 161 KiB and 93 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 67 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    28 KiB

    About 28 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 154 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Your largest element takes 4.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Redefine Flank Steak with chimichurri and mash, the pack be…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

11 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Real visitors wait 108 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 410 ms

    410 ms

    Real visitors wait 410 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 68% faster for real visitors

    -68%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 17 ms

    17 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 17 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix86
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    redefine-bratwurst-in-wine-sauce.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    387 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example redefine-bratwurst-in-wine-sauce.webp at 2,560 px wide, shown at 315 px. Resized copies would save about 387 KiB.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.43 g of CO₂e: 51.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.5 MB in 24 requests

    1.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 24 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (11), scripts 159 KiB (4) and fonts 83 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 10098
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 67 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 67 pages on redefinemeat.com and 5 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 117 characters

    Your meta description is 117 characters: “Creating a world where anyone can enjoy great New-Meat, without compromising on taste, sustainability, or experience.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Redefine Meat for New-Meat* Lovers”.

  • Title: 39 characters

    Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “New Meat, No Compromise | Redefine Meat”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.redefinemeat.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.redefinemeat.com/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (230 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.redefinemeat.com/llms.txt (25 KiB, 236 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    / and https://www.redefinemeat.com/uk all use the title “New Meat, No Compromise | Redefine Meat”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.redefinemeat.com/choose and https://www.redefinemeat.com/uk/choose use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://www.redefinemeat.com/he, https://www.redefinemeat.com/choose and https://www.redefinemeat.com/uk/choose have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 28 small tap targets

    28 of 50 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/beacon.min.js/vce701823e78c4301a35b7e07294d87301792088814092'…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 243 words

    The homepage has only about 243 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at redefinemeat.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Astro
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Founded
2018

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on redefinemeat.com, including 7 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25