Website review, no card needed

redmondschools.org logo

redmondschools.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202641 issues · 90 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on redmondschools.org, 14 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.7 sMay 9Oct 241.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
103 ms84 msMay 9Oct 2499 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202686 ms
May 16, 202689 ms
May 23, 202692 ms
May 30, 202690 ms
Jun 6, 202696 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 2026100 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202698 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 202699 ms
Aug 1, 2026101 ms
Aug 8, 202697 ms
Aug 15, 202695 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202697 ms
Oct 3, 202693 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 2026100 ms
Oct 24, 202699 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of redmondschools.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. redmondschools.org at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. redmondschools.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. redmondschools.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. redmondschools.org at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. redmondschools.org at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. redmondschools.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. redmondschools.org at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. redmondschools.org at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

13 to fix38
  • Improve image delivery

    3.0 s · 3.0 MB

    12 images could be 3.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.5 s

    47 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.9 s · 688 KiB

    About 688 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    850 ms · 1.5 MB

    42 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, parentsquare.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 6.6 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • parentsquare.com adds 256 ms

    256 ms

    parentsquare.com costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 5.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 140 KiB

    About 140 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google CDN adds 555 ms

    555 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 555 ms of main-thread work and 743 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 456 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,925 HTML elements

    The page has 2,925 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Adobe TypeKit adds 12 ms

    12 ms

    Adobe TypeKit costs a phone 12 ms of main-thread work and 430 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 32 KiB

    32 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 15 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 29 ms

    29 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.3 s

    21.3 s

    Your largest element takes 21.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Three people in blue workwear collaborate in a workshop set…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.8 s

    23.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 862 ms

    862 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 862 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Real visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 742 ms

    742 ms

    Real visitors wait 742 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 152 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 152 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (24), scripts 1.5 MB (70) and fonts 1.3 MB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    inline_images_8887e8736113e957_1793396092705-Copy+of+Copy+of weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    797 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example inline_images_8887e8736113e957_1793396092705-Copy+of+Copy+of at 1,080 px wide, shown at 227 px. Resized copies would save about 797 KiB.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (563 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.10 g of CO₂e: 252.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 10097
  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 50 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9289
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (26 characters)

    Your meta description is only 26 characters: “Redmond School District 2J”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 262 internal links, 43 external

    The homepage links to 262 pages on redmondschools.org and 43 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Homepage”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Redmond School District 2J - Home”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://redmondschools.org/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.redmondschools.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.redmondschools.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,056 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix69
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.redmondschools.org/emergency-operations-plan is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.redmondschools.org/school-safety and https://www.redmondschools.org/school-safety-home all use the title “Redmond School District 2J - School Safety Home”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.redmondschools.org/emergency-operations-plan has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 pages share a meta description

    https://www.redmondschools.org/our-district, https://www.redmondschools.org/331485_2, https://www.redmondschools.org/data-reporting-and-district-plans, https://www.redmondschools.org/districtstaff, https://www.redmondschools.org/mission-and-vision and https://www.redmondschools.org/school-safety and 6 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.redmondschools.org/school-safety, whose canonical is https://www.redmondschools.org/school-safety-home. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.redmondschools.org/emergency-operations-plan has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.redmondschools.org/emergency-operations-plan and https://www.redmondschools.org/safeoregon took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 116 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 92100
  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    40 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 9 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 485 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 485 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 26 calls to action

    The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Contact Our Team”, “Meeting Schedule” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at redmondschools.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
AWS

Company

Headquarters
Redmond

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on redmondschools.org, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25