Website review, no card needed
redriver.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202641 issues · 89 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on redriver.com, 18 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 94 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 88 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 81 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 112 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.4 s · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.5 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 623 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (623 KiB).
Google CDN adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.9 s
A phone's processor spends 8.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 3.3 MB and 3.4 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 192 KiBAbout 192 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 874 ms
874 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 874 ms of main-thread work and 419 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hubspot adds 632 ms
632 msHubspot costs a phone 632 ms of main-thread work and 570 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
hsappstatic.net adds 515 ms
515 mshsappstatic.net costs a phone 515 ms of main-thread work and 711 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
200 ms · 289 KiB2 images could be 289 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 394 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.3 s
12.3 sYour largest element takes 12.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “HELPING FEDERAL AGENCIES NAVIGATE CHANGE. Drive Efficiency,…”.
Time to Interactive: 28.5 s
28.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.8 s
2.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 10.0 s
10.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 59% slower for real visitors
+59%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 734 ms
734 msReal visitors wait 734 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.01
0.01The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.01, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 131 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 131 requests on a phone: scripts 3.3 MB (46), images 778 KiB (26) and other files 730 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.58 g of CO₂e: 189.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
13 text elements with low contrast
13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (170 characters)
Your meta description is 170 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
10 links with vague text
10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
183 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 183 pages on redriver.com and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Helping Federal Agencies Navigate Change.”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Enterprise IT Solutions, Cloud & Cybersecurity | Red River”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://redriver.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, Place and WebPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://redriver.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,031 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://redriver.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 33 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://redriver.com/our-business/managed-services-2/cloud, https://redriver.com/our-business/managed-services-2/collaboration and https://redriver.com/our-business/managed-services-2/cybersecurity have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://redriver.com/company/about-us/contact-us, whose canonical is https://redriver.com/company/overview/contact-us. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=307004021&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=00e63fd1-01a4-4d12-859a-9c1ebc3da9ee&bo=1&sid=8ec83160d55711f1a43ce187e6fe45da&vid=8ec84b30d55711f18942c50e8cd06cd8&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.
8 small tap targets
8 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 736 words of copy
The homepage carries about 736 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT” and “LEARN MORE”.
16 calls to action
The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “CONTACT”, “GET STARTED” and “LEARN MORE”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
36 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at redriver.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 712
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on redriver.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.