Website review, no card needed
relatech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202614 issues · 68 checks
This review found 14 issues worth fixing on relatech.com, 4 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 184 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 167 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
1 long task on the main thread
1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 57 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
52 KiBAbout 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (nitrocdn.com and Google Fonts), adding 107 KiB and 17 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 100
100/100Your mobile performance score is 100. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 75 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 190 ms
190 msYour server sent the HTML in 190 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 210 ms
210 msReal visitors wait 210 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 611 ms
611 msReal visitors wait 611 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 188 ms to 167 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.009
0.009The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.009, good is under 0.1).
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sYour largest element renders in 1.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Dall’era agentica al valore misurabile, end-to-end”.
Speed Index: 1.7 s
1.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 1.7 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 4 ms
4 msScripts block the page for only 4 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe page is fully interactive after 1.4 s.
Images and page weight
About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit
0.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.23 g of CO₂e: 28.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 842 KiB in 36 requests
842 KiBYour homepage downloads 842 KiB in 36 requests on a phone: other files 678 KiB (28), stylesheets 76 KiB (5) and HTML 57 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
25 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 27 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 25 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
151 internal links, 17 external
The homepage links to 151 pages on relatech.com and 17 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Relatech è il partner per la digital transformation delle aziende. Consulenza strategica, digital enabler e soluzioni v…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Dall’era agentica al valore misurabile,end-to-end”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Relatech | Innovazione e Trasformazione Digitale per Aziende”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://relatech.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://relatech.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://relatech.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://relatech.com/value-proposition-2026 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages without a meta description
https://relatech.com/soluzioni/corporate-performance-management, https://relatech.com/soluzioni/piattaforma-e3, https://relatech.com/soluzioni/pascal and https://relatech.com/soluzioni/iot-catalyst have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page slow to respond
https://relatech.com/advisory took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 6 words
The homepage has only about 6 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: iubenda
A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at relatech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- COLT Technology Services Group Limited
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 14 issues on relatech.com, including 4 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.