Website review, no card needed
remiscalp.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202632 issues · 80 checks
This review found 32 issues worth fixing on remiscalp.com, 12 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 6.2 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #30,907 of 108,952 reviewed websitesbeats 66%
- #20,616 of 61,775 online storesbeats 60%
- #19,946 of 56,370 Shopify storesbeats 58%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 118 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 155 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 6.2 s
A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 2.0 MB13 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, rechargecdn.com and Shopify and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 562 KiBAbout 562 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
950 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 76 KiBAbout 76 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Klaviyo adds 255 ms
255 msKlaviyo costs a phone 255 ms of main-thread work and 389 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
rechargecdn.com adds 217 ms
217 msrechargecdn.com costs a phone 217 ms of main-thread work and 296 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,171 HTML elements
The page has 2,171 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 202 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Duplicated JavaScript
150 ms · 38 KiB38 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
151 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (151 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 11 ms
11 msYour server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 16.0 s
16.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.6 s
9.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sYour largest element takes 4.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Total Blocking Time: 776 ms
776 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 776 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 118 ms to 155 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 157 ms
157 msReal visitors wait 157 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 377 ms
377 msReal visitors wait 377 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 45% faster for real visitors
-45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.083
0.083The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.083, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.3 MB in 272 requests
5.3 MBYour homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 272 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (39), scripts 1.5 MB (87) and other files 859 KiB (130). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images far larger than shown
1.6 MB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example IMG_1291.heic at 3,024 px wide, shown at 306 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Banner_0001.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.50 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.50 g of CO₂e: 179.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
12 images without alt text
12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).
1 checks passed
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
71 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 71 pages on remiscalp.com and 11 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “Create your best head of hair with Remi's clinic-led science. Treat your scalp like skin for hair that’s thicker, stron…”.
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Remi - Scalp Care | Born In Ireland”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://remiscalp.com/en-us.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://remiscalp.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,148 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://remiscalp.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages share 2 titles
https://remiscalp.com/en-us and https://remiscalp.com/en-us/products/energy-reset-duo all use the title “Remi - Scalp Care | Born In Ireland”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://remiscalp.com/en-us/collections/all, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/faqs, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/subscribe-save, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/about, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/contact and https://remiscalp.com/en-ie/collections/all and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://remiscalp.com/en-ie/collections/all, whose canonical is https://remiscalp.com/en-us/collections/all. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
8 pages without an H1
https://remiscalp.com/en-us/collections/all, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/faqs, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/subscribe-save, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/about, https://remiscalp.com/en-us/pages/contact and https://remiscalp.com/en-ie/collections/all and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
52 small tap targets
52 of 135 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,394 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,394 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Scalp Solutions”.
29 calls to action
The homepage has 29 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Subscribe & Save” and “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 282 testimonial or review blocks, 8 customer or partner logos, 1 trust badge and “20K+ HAPPY CUSTOMERS”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Hotjar.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at remiscalp.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Sami Wholesale · Hotjar Install · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Essential Pre Order Presale · cloudfront.net · rechargecdn.com · loox.io · octaneai.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Hotjar
- Hosting
- Shopify
Hiring
- Hiring
- 5 open roles
- Teams
- R&D (4), Success (1)
- Job board
- bamboohr
- Careers page
- remi.bamboohr.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 32 issues on remiscalp.com, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.