Website review, no card needed

remisco.com logo

remisco.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202634 issues · 73 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on remisco.com, 11 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.6 s1.6 sJun 20Oct 313.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 20, 20265.4 s
Jun 27, 20265.7 s
Jul 4, 20266.1 s
Jul 18, 20265.8 s
Jul 25, 20265.1 s
Aug 1, 20264.5 s
Aug 8, 20264.4 s
Aug 15, 20264.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.5 s
Oct 31, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
106 ms87 msJun 20Oct 31104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 2026100 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202694 ms
Sep 19, 2026101 ms
Sep 26, 202699 ms
Oct 3, 2026101 ms
Oct 10, 2026103 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms
Oct 24, 2026100 ms
Oct 31, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of remisco.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. remisco.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. remisco.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. remisco.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. remisco.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. remisco.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. remisco.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  7. remisco.com at 5.8 s5.8 s
  8. remisco.com at 6.7 s6.7 s

Speed

5 to fix75
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 741 KiB

    11 images could be 741 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    650 ms · 184 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (184 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 702 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 192 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify CSS

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 5 KiB and 4 ms of main-thread time.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.7 s).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 279 ms

    279 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 279 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 38% faster for real visitors

    -38%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.4 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037

    0.037

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix14
  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 47 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 47 requests on a phone: media 3.9 MB (1), images 833 KiB (22) and scripts 184 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    island.png weighs 523 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    576 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example island.png at 5,401 px wide, shown at 691 px. Resized copies would save about 576 KiB.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    island.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (671 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.46 g of CO₂e: 175.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 8795
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (7 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 110 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9283
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Article, Organization, Person and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Person: sameAs is not an absolute URL ("anhari")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 48 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 48 pages on remisco.com and 4 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “درباره رمیس و اقیانوس راهکارهایش”.

  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “رمیس | راهکارهای زیرساخت دیجیتال - Remis”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://remisco.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://remisco.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://remisco.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://remisco.com/service/security and https://remisco.com/service/security-2 all use the title “Security - Remis”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://remisco.com/blogs, https://remisco.com/contact-us, https://remisco.com/about-us, https://remisco.com/service/web-app-tie, https://remisco.com/service/foundational-data-services and https://remisco.com/service/fundamental-services and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://remisco.com/about-us has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    https://remisco.com/blogs, https://remisco.com/contact-us, https://remisco.com/about-us, https://remisco.com/service/web-app-tie, https://remisco.com/service/foundational-data-services and https://remisco.com/service/fundamental-services and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://remisco.com/about-us took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Only about 106 words

    The homepage has only about 106 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at remisco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Hosting
Vandad Vira Hooman LLC

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on remisco.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25