Website review, no card needed

remo.co logo

remo.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202636 issues · 84 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on remo.co, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 172.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
114 ms85 msMay 2Oct 1788 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202693 ms
May 9, 202691 ms
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202691 ms
May 30, 202694 ms
Jun 6, 202696 ms
Jun 13, 202696 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 202698 ms
Jul 18, 202697 ms
Jul 25, 202697 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202698 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Aug 22, 202694 ms
Aug 29, 202692 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 2026105 ms
Sep 19, 2026111 ms
Sep 26, 2026111 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202688 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of remo.co (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. remo.co at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. remo.co at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. remo.co at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. remo.co at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. remo.co at 2.4 s2.4 s
  6. remo.co at 2.9 s2.9 s
  7. remo.co at 3.4 s3.4 s
  8. remo.co at 3.9 s3.9 s

Speed

14 to fix34
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.2 s · 8.6 MB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.6 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    8.8 s · 2.2 MB

    About 2.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    7.0 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.0 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 175 KiB

    About 175 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Hubspot and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 17.5 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 195 ms

    195 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 195 ms of main-thread work and 9.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 696 ms

    696 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 696 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hubspot adds 468 ms

    468 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 468 ms of main-thread work and 554 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 336 ms

    336 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 336 ms of main-thread work and 511 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 363 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,265 HTML elements

    The page has 2,265 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • ZenDesk adds 114 ms

    114 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 114 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    133 KiB

    11 images could be 133 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 15.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.2 s

    25.2 s

    Your largest element takes 25.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Transform Boring Virtual Meetings into Real-Life Events”.

  • Time to Interactive: 36.9 s

    36.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 36.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 920 ms

    920 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 920 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 887 ms

    887 ms

    Real visitors wait 887 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 34 images without width and height

    34 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004

    0.004

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 19.0 MB in 214 requests

    19.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.0 MB in 214 requests on a phone: media 7.8 MB (2), other files 4.9 MB (56) and scripts 4.0 MB (57). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (89 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.38 g of CO₂e: 645.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9194
  • 72 tap targets too small

    72 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 121 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 215 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 215 pages on remo.co and 20 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Remo is the virtual event platform for conferences, career fairs and networking where conversations happen naturally. G…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Transform Boring Virtual Meetings into Real-Life Events”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Virtual Event Platform Built for Human Connection | Remo”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://remo.co/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://remo.co/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://remo.co/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,056 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://remo.co/bookdemo has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://remo.co/bookdemo has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 72 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,177 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,177 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Demo” and “View Pricing”.

  • 16 calls to action

    The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Book a Demo →”, “Pricing” and “Book Demo”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 15 customer or partner logos, 8 trust badges and “100+ Reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot and Plausible.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 51 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at remo.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Plausible | Microsoft Clarity

Hiring

Hiring
4 open roles
Teams
Clinical (3), Clinical Operations (1)
Job board
ashby

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on remo.co, including 24 speed issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25