Website review, no card needed

renold.com logo

renold.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202635 issues · 84 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on renold.com, 12 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.6 sMay 16Oct 312.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
93 ms78 msMay 16Oct 3180 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202680 ms
May 23, 202685 ms
May 30, 202687 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jun 27, 202684 ms
Jul 4, 202680 ms
Jul 11, 202685 ms
Jul 18, 202687 ms
Jul 25, 202684 ms
Aug 1, 202685 ms
Aug 8, 202684 ms
Aug 15, 202684 ms
Aug 22, 202684 ms
Aug 29, 202683 ms
Sep 5, 202682 ms
Sep 12, 202681 ms
Sep 19, 202681 ms
Sep 26, 202683 ms
Oct 3, 202683 ms
Oct 10, 202687 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms
Oct 24, 202680 ms
Oct 31, 202680 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of renold.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. renold.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. renold.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. renold.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. renold.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. renold.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. renold.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. renold.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. renold.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix58
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.5 s · 417 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (417 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 5.2 MB

    5 images could be 5.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 133 KiB

    About 133 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    About 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Maps, Adobe TypeKit and Cloudflare CDN), adding 323 KiB and 109 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 126 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 235 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Your largest element takes 8.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.303

    0.303

    The layout shifts by 0.303 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 80 ms to 80 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 90 ms

    90 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 90 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 13.0 MB in 69 requests

    13.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.0 MB in 69 requests on a phone: images 12.6 MB (43), fonts 208 KiB (7) and scripts 182 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    imagegen.ashx weighs 5.0 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    5.0 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example imagegen.ashx at 4,000 px wide, shown at 172 px. Resized copies would save about 5.0 MB.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (5.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (5.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.69 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.69 g of CO₂e: 442.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7990
  • <dt> and <dd> elements must be contained by a <dl> (6 elements)

    <dt> and <dd> elements must be contained by a <dl>: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements (2 elements)

    <dl> elements must only directly contain properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 20 images without alt text

    20 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 form fields without a label

    13 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9284
  • 18 H1 headlines

    There are 18 <h1> headlines (“Renold ACP Series”, “Now available!” and “The Chain You Need In Stock Right Now”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Bad control character in string literal in JSON at position )”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 116 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 116 pages on renold.com and 7 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “Renold are the world's leading manufacturer of chains, gears and couplings for a range of applications. FInd out more a…”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Manufacturer of Chain, Gears and Couplings - Renold Plc”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.renold.com/xmlsitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.renold.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,183 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.renold.com/products/renold-couplings and https://www.renold.com/products/renold-couplings/browse-our-clutches use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 53 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 7 distorted images

    7 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 354 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 354 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Request callback” and “Request brochures”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 3 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at renold.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
AWS

Company

Employees
2,379
Founded
1903
Headquarters
Wythenshawe

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on renold.com, including 12 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25