Website review, no card needed

reska.id logo

reska.id website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202654 issues · 96 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on reska.id, 24 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.2 s3.7 sMay 9Oct 243.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.9 s
May 16, 20264.1 s
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.1 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.9 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.0 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.9 s
Sep 12, 20263.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.9 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms120 msMay 9Oct 24130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026127 ms
May 16, 2026128 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026127 ms
Jun 13, 2026125 ms
Jun 20, 2026124 ms
Jun 27, 2026125 ms
Jul 4, 2026125 ms
Jul 11, 2026123 ms
Jul 18, 2026128 ms
Jul 25, 2026130 ms
Aug 1, 2026131 ms
Aug 8, 2026134 ms
Aug 15, 2026130 ms
Aug 22, 2026127 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026133 ms
Sep 19, 2026136 ms
Sep 26, 2026140 ms
Oct 3, 2026139 ms
Oct 10, 2026129 ms
Oct 17, 2026128 ms
Oct 24, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of reska.id (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. reska.id at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. reska.id at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. reska.id at 3.3 s3.3 s
  4. reska.id at 4.4 s4.4 s
  5. reska.id at 5.5 s5.5 s
  6. reska.id at 6.6 s6.6 s
  7. reska.id at 7.7 s7.7 s
  8. reska.id at 8.8 s8.8 s

Speed

10 to fix37
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.0 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and lokomart.id and others), adding 7.4 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • lokomart.id adds 275 ms

    275 ms

    lokomart.id costs a phone 275 ms of main-thread work and 5.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    504 KiB

    4 images could be 504 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 325 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 294 ms

    294 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 294 ms of main-thread work and 288 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 87 KiB

    About 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    54 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (54 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    Real visitors wait 6.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.1 s

    20.1 s

    Your largest element takes 20.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.3 s

    24.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.0 s

    12.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 150 ms

    150 ms

    Real visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 682 ms

    682 ms

    Real visitors wait 682 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 7.5 MB in 100 requests

    7.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.5 MB in 100 requests on a phone: images 4.7 MB (32), scripts 2.2 MB (27) and fonts 231 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    888 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example _4.jpg at 2,738 px wide, shown at 70 px. Resized copies would save about 888 KiB.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (1,021 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (704 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.13 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.13 g of CO₂e: 255.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 6782
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 links without text

    14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Hidden but focusable

    4 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Headings should not be empty (4 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 13 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 7363
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (10 characters)

    Your title is only 10 characters: “RMU - Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.reska.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at reska.id/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 36 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on reska.id and 19 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Pemesanan Makanan & minuman”.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.reska.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (523 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 16 pages share a title

    /, https://www.reska.id/index.php/home, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking and https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe and 10 others all use the title “RMU - Home”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.reska.id/index.php/home, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe and https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/re and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/re and https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/security and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.reska.id/index.php/kontak and https://www.reska.id/index.php/Gcg have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe, https://www.reska.id/frontend/web/whistleblowing-system and https://www.reska.id/index.php/Gcg and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6983
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://qiscus-sdk.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/public/qismo/qismo-v4.css' from origin …”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 638 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 638 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “PRE ORDER”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at reska.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Iconpln Id Ap Isp Pt Indonesia Comnets Plus

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on reska.id, including 19 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25