Website review, no card needed
reska.id website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202654 issues · 96 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on reska.id, 24 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 130 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.0 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 1.6 s
1.6 sYouTube costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and lokomart.id and others), adding 7.4 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
lokomart.id adds 275 ms
275 mslokomart.id costs a phone 275 ms of main-thread work and 5.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
504 KiB4 images could be 504 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 325 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 294 ms
294 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 294 ms of main-thread work and 288 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 87 KiBAbout 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
54 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (54 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.0 s
6.0 sReal visitors wait 6.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.1 s
20.1 sYour largest element takes 20.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 24.3 s
24.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.0 s
12.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 150 ms
150 msReal visitors wait 150 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 682 ms
682 msReal visitors wait 682 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.5 MB in 100 requests
7.5 MBYour homepage downloads 7.5 MB in 100 requests on a phone: images 4.7 MB (32), scripts 2.2 MB (27) and fonts 231 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images far larger than shown
888 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example _4.jpg at 2,738 px wide, shown at 70 px. Resized copies would save about 888 KiB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (1,021 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (704 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.13 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.13 g of CO₂e: 255.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
14 links without text
14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Hidden but focusable
4 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Headings should not be empty (4 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 13 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (10 characters)
Your title is only 10 characters: “RMU - Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.reska.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at reska.id/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
7 links with vague text
7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
36 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 36 pages on reska.id and 19 external pages.
1 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Pemesanan Makanan & minuman”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.reska.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (523 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
16 pages share a title
/, https://www.reska.id/index.php/home, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking and https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe and 10 others all use the title “RMU - Home”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.reska.id/index.php/home, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe and https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/re and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages without an H1
https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/re and https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/security and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.reska.id/index.php/kontak and https://www.reska.id/index.php/Gcg have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
7 pages slow to respond
https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/Rot, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/resparking, https://www.reska.id/index.php/TentangKami/cafe, https://www.reska.id/frontend/web/whistleblowing-system and https://www.reska.id/index.php/Gcg and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://qiscus-sdk.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/public/qismo/qismo-v4.css' from origin …”.
4 distorted images
4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 638 words of copy
The homepage carries about 638 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “PRE ORDER”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at reska.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Iconpln Id Ap Isp Pt Indonesia Comnets Plus
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 54 issues on reska.id, including 19 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.