Website review, no card needed

richmondamerican.com logo

richmondamerican.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202642 issues · 85 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on richmondamerican.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.3 s4.0 sMay 9Oct 244.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.0 s
May 16, 20265.1 s
May 23, 20265.2 s
May 30, 20265.2 s
Jun 6, 20265.2 s
Jun 13, 20265.1 s
Jun 20, 20265.0 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.8 s
Jul 11, 20264.8 s
Jul 18, 20264.8 s
Jul 25, 20264.7 s
Aug 1, 20264.7 s
Aug 8, 20264.6 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20264.4 s
Aug 29, 20264.4 s
Sep 5, 20264.3 s
Sep 12, 20264.2 s
Sep 19, 20264.2 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Oct 10, 20264.3 s
Oct 17, 20264.2 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
139 ms128 msMay 9Oct 24138 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026136 ms
May 16, 2026137 ms
May 23, 2026137 ms
May 30, 2026137 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026137 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026137 ms
Jul 4, 2026136 ms
Jul 11, 2026135 ms
Jul 18, 2026133 ms
Jul 25, 2026131 ms
Aug 1, 2026130 ms
Aug 8, 2026130 ms
Aug 15, 2026130 ms
Aug 22, 2026130 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026129 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026129 ms
Sep 26, 2026134 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026138 ms
Oct 17, 2026138 ms
Oct 24, 2026138 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of richmondamerican.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. richmondamerican.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. richmondamerican.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. richmondamerican.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. richmondamerican.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. richmondamerican.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. richmondamerican.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. richmondamerican.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. richmondamerican.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

12 to fix38
  • Improve image delivery

    5.8 s · 1.2 MB

    2 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 891 KiB

    About 891 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 452 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (452 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 56). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, osano.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 893 ms

    893 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 893 ms of main-thread work and 715 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    430 ms · 60 KiB

    About 60 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 430 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • osano.com adds 281 ms

    281 ms

    osano.com costs a phone 281 ms of main-thread work and 83 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 268 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google CDN adds 160 ms

    160 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 160 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 99 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.31

    0.31

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.31 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    Your largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.0 s

    23.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 138 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 153 ms

    153 ms

    Real visitors wait 153 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 423 ms

    423 ms

    Real visitors wait 423 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.0 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix40
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    hero_video_fallback.jpg weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    541 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example hero_video_fallback.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 541 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 136 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 136 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (52), images 1.2 MB (18) and HTML 87 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (1.1 MB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.02 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.02 g of CO₂e: 122.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9393
  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Positive tabindex

    1 element has a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9279
  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Richmond American”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Come homefor the holidays!” and “Find your place.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 37 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 37 pages on richmondamerican.com and 11 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Searching new homes for sale? Start your house hunt with us! We build a range of floor plans with designer details, rea…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.richmondamerican.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.richmondamerican.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.richmondamerican.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,873 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix85
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.richmondamerican.com/home-design, https://www.richmondamerican.com/home-design/floor-plan-design, https://www.richmondamerican.com/home-design/design-studio, https://www.richmondamerican.com/home-design/quality-homes, https://www.richmondamerican.com/home-design/energy-efficient-homes and https://www.richmondamerican.com/home-design/new-construction-homes and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 5 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.richmondamerican.com/home-design, whose canonical is https://www.richmondamerican.com/why-richmond. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.richmondamerican.com/blog has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 57 small tap targets

    57 of 93 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “clickdimensions is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 26 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • About 1,855 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,855 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Warranty Request”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Warranty Request” and “Sign Up”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (6 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at richmondamerican.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Company

Founded
1972

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on richmondamerican.com, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25