Website review, no card needed

rickowens.eu logo

rickowens.eu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202630 issues · 80 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on rickowens.eu, 10 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 188.7 MB in 226 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.1 sMay 16Oct 311.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.1 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
131 ms114 msMay 16Oct 31121 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026125 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026129 ms
Jun 20, 2026129 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026127 ms
Jul 11, 2026126 ms
Jul 18, 2026124 ms
Jul 25, 2026123 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026119 ms
Aug 29, 2026119 ms
Sep 5, 2026119 ms
Sep 12, 2026119 ms
Sep 19, 2026119 ms
Sep 26, 2026118 ms
Oct 3, 2026116 ms
Oct 10, 2026116 ms
Oct 17, 2026117 ms
Oct 24, 2026119 ms
Oct 31, 2026121 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rickowens.eu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rickowens.eu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. rickowens.eu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. rickowens.eu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. rickowens.eu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. rickowens.eu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. rickowens.eu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. rickowens.eu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. rickowens.eu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix59
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 473 KiB

    About 473 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 156 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (156 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    850 ms

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and iubenda and others), adding 1.2 MB and 703 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 348 ms

    348 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 348 ms of main-thread work and 519 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 872 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,636 HTML elements

    The page has 1,636 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    90 ms · 19 KiB

    19 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    29 KiB

    About 29 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    19 KiB

    1 image could be 19 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 34 ms

    34 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    Your largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We (owenscorp.myshopify.com/) and selected third parties (1…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 224 ms

    224 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 224 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 182 ms

    182 ms

    Real visitors wait 182 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 633 ms

    633 ms

    Real visitors wait 633 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 188.7 MB in 226 requests

    188.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 188.7 MB in 226 requests on a phone: media 185.5 MB (14), scripts 1.4 MB (77) and images 876 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 53.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    53.48 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 53.48 g of CO₂e: 6418.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Summary elements must have discernible text (7 elements)

    Summary elements must have discernible text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9287
  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “RICK OWENS | OFFICIAL WEBSITE”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 16 links crawlers can't follow

    16 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 103 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 103 pages on rickowens.eu and 0 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “SHOP THE LATEST RICK OWENS MENSWEAR, WOMENSWEAR, UNISEX, SHOES AND ACCESSORIES NOW ON THE OFFICIAL RICK OWENS STORE WIT…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Logo Logo”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rickowens.eu/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rickowens.eu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rickowens.eu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,448 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.rickowens.eu/collections/women-rick-owens has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.rickowens.eu/collections/new-arrivals-women-all, https://www.rickowens.eu/collections/womens-all, https://www.rickowens.eu/collections/womens-outerwear and https://www.rickowens.eu/collections/womens-dresses use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 72 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    5 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fix87
  • 33 small tap targets

    33 of 44 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 250 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 250 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rickowens.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 5 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Analyzify Ga4 Ads Tracking · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · webmarked.net · automizely.com · riskified.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on rickowens.eu, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25