Website review, no card needed
rishabh.co.in website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202647 issues · 93 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on rishabh.co.in, 16 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 38.7 MB in 91 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 204 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 170 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.4 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.
16,767 HTML elements
The page has 16,767 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 444 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
400 ms · 37.7 MB45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (37.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
19.6 MB14 images could be 19.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Document request latency
650 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 650 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
643 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 643 ms on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
330 ms · 198 KiBAbout 198 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 330 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 56 KiBAbout 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
JSDelivr CDN adds 188 ms
188 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 188 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 743 ms
743 msYour server takes 743 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Cloudflare CDN and jQuery CDN and others), adding 816 KiB and 325 ms of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
101 KiB101 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 55 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 18.8 s
18.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 91.5 s
91.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 91.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sYour largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Smart Solutions for a Sustainable Future”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.2 s).
First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sThe first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 287 ms
287 msReal visitors wait 287 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
51 images without width and height
51 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 204 ms to 170 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 6 ms
6 msScripts block the page for only 6 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 38.7 MB in 91 requests
38.7 MBYour homepage downloads 38.7 MB in 91 requests on a phone: images 37.7 MB (46), scripts 371 KiB (13) and fonts 348 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
16 images over 500 KB
16 images weigh 33.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
25 images far larger than shown
27.8 MB25 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Power_Utility Infrastructure.jpg at 5,000 px wide, shown at 374 px. Resized copies would save about 27.8 MB.
32 images in older formats
32 images (37.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
33 images below the first screen load straight away
33 images further down the page (35.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
WEB BANNER DESIGN_15 OCT 2026.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 11.0 g of CO₂ per visit
10.97 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 10.97 g of CO₂e: 1316.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
11 images without alt text
11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
21 form fields without a label
21 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (5 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
268 links crawlers can't follow
268 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“About Rishabh Instruments”, “About Rishabh Instruments” and “View”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
69 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 69 pages on rishabh.co.in and 22 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Rishabh Instruments Limited | Home”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://rishabh.co.in/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,277 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://rishabh.co.in/llms.txt (22 KiB, 0 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://rishabh.co.in/about-us, https://rishabh.co.in/legacy, https://rishabh.co.in/business-philosophy, https://rishabh.co.in/milestones, https://rishabh.co.in/board-of-directors and https://rishabh.co.in/corporate-social-responsibility and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 60 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Ignoring duplicate Content-Security-Policy directive 'img-src'.”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 731 words of copy
The homepage carries about 731 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Investor Relations Contact Details”, “Download Center” and “Contact Us”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 20 customer or partner logos and “10000+ Happy Clients”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rishabh.co.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on rishabh.co.in, including 22 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.