Website review, no card needed

riterug.com logo

riterug.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202628 issues · 82 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on riterug.com, 6 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s975 msMay 16Oct 311.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.2 s
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.2 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.2 s
Jun 20, 20261.1 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.2 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.2 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.0 s
Sep 26, 20261.0 s
Oct 3, 20261.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.1 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
104 ms85 msMay 16Oct 3196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202687 ms
May 30, 202687 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202688 ms
Jun 20, 202689 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202696 ms
Jul 18, 202696 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202694 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202695 ms
Sep 5, 202695 ms
Sep 12, 202692 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 202695 ms
Oct 3, 202695 ms
Oct 10, 2026100 ms
Oct 17, 2026102 ms
Oct 24, 202698 ms
Oct 31, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of riterug.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. riterug.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. riterug.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. riterug.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. riterug.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. riterug.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. riterug.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. riterug.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. riterug.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

11 to fix71
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.5 s · 405 KiB

    16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (405 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 1.3 MB

    20 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 166 KiB

    About 166 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    600 ms · 134 KiB

    134 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 295 KiB

    About 295 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Shopify and others), adding 1.3 MB and 356 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 356 ms

    356 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 356 ms of main-thread work and 520 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 58 KiB

    58 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Shopify adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 717 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 142 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    22 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 439 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 34 ms

    34 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Your largest element takes 7.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A study with a herringbone hardwood floor and a RiteRug are…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Real visitors wait 102 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 516 ms

    516 ms

    Real visitors wait 516 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 86 ms

    86 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 86 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.014

    0.014

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.014, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 62 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 62 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (21), scripts 857 KiB (13) and stylesheets 206 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    51 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5153d8e7b0947ae73688d94e956849a72dd59656.jpg at 1,100 px wide, shown at 362 px. Resized copies would save about 51 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (191 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 96.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

Google 98100
  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10088
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “RiteRug Flooring | Carpet, Tile, Hardwood, Vinyl, Laminate Flooring”.

  • Meta description is long (288 characters)

    Your meta description is 288 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 151 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 151 pages on riterug.com and 0 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Find Your Perfect Floor, Rite Here. Rite Now.™”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.riterug.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.riterug.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (679 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    /pages/appointments and /visualizer all use the title “Appointments | RiteRug Flooring”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages share a meta description

    /pages/appointments and /visualizer use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /visualizer, whose canonical is /pages/appointments. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    /pages/appointments, /pages/locations, /pages/customer-care, /visualizer, /collections/5-x-7-rugs and /collections/7-x-10-rugs and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 130 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187018247&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=6397b041-d77b-40c4-a817-2bb2500d0209&bo=1&sid=1cc1fab0d97711f18ebc47e948572fee&vid=1cc21920d97711f1918f179f4a61f246&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    37 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 874 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 874 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “☎ Call 1-888-RITERUG” and “Book in-home”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Book free in-home shoppingBook in-home”, “Shop Area Rugs →” and “Schedule Free In-Home Shopping”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at riterug.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Azure

Company

Employees
932
Headquarters
Columbus

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on riterug.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25