Website review, no card needed
ritkeep.au website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202635 issues · 84 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on ritkeep.au, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 6.6 MB in 301 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #25,240 of 90,300 reviewed websitesbeats 67%
- #15,762 of 47,399 online storesbeats 60%
- #15,168 of 42,620 Shopify storesbeats 57%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 149 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
3,014 HTML elements
The page has 3,014 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 66
66/100Your mobile performance score is 66. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
680 ms · 278 KiBAbout 278 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 680 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 225 KiB17 images could be 225 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Shopify and 1clicklabs.io and others), adding 1.6 MB and 248 ms of main-thread time.
Main-thread work: 2.0 s
A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 818 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1clicklabs.io adds 16 ms
16 ms1clicklabs.io costs a phone 16 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 103 ms
103 msShopify costs a phone 103 ms of main-thread work and 300 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
220 ms · 43 KiBAbout 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 220 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 61 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
22 KiB7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 176 ms
176 msYour server sent the HTML in 176 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.1 s
14.1 sYour largest element takes 14.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 15.4 s
15.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.0 s
7.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s
2.2 sThe first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 96 ms
96 msReal visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 490 ms
490 msReal visitors wait 490 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 9 ms
9 msScripts block the page for only 9 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.6 MB in 301 requests
6.6 MBYour homepage downloads 6.6 MB in 301 requests on a phone: images 4.5 MB (72), other files 956 KiB (151) and scripts 811 KiB (65). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
29 images in older formats
29 images (8.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (50 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.86 g of CO₂e: 222.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
32 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
7 tap targets too small
7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets (6 elements)
Inline text spacing must be adjustable with custom stylesheets: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
20 images without alt text
20 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (85 characters)
Your title is 85 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Smith Machine | Power Cage | Free Weight | Weight Bench | RitKeep – RITKEEP Australia”.
Meta description is long (188 characters)
Your meta description is 188 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
255 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 255 pages on ritkeep.au and 14 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “RITKEEP Australia”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ritkeep.au/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ritkeep.au/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,487 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
/collections/power-rack-package and /collections/free-weight-package have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /collections/home-gym-smith-machine-package/products/nimitz-n1-counterbalanced-all-in-one-smith-machine-package, whose canonical is /products/nimitz-n1-counterbalanced-all-in-one-smith-machine-package. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/pages/2026-black-friday has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 98 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97052050&tm=shpfy_ui&Ver=2&mid=6de9713d-3c92-4986-9d49-ad8659f0ad20&bo=1&sid=b4307860dd0711f1a30ea11058b794eb&vid=b430dda0dd0711f1a264ad56ee123be9&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected identifier 'gtag'”.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
56 of 63 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 17 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
About 966 words of copy
The homepage carries about 966 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Shop All Smith Machines”, “Shop All Power Rack” and “Register Now”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 4 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Ads and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
21 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ritkeep.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Inbox · Ryviu Product Reviews · 1clickpopup · Frequently Bought · Gsc Countdown Timer · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Pushowl · Propel Replays
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on ritkeep.au, including 12 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.